Ba v Holder, et al
Filing
22
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 7/2/2018 ORDERING that the case REMAINS held in abeyance; The parties shall submit a joint status report on or before 9/7/2018. (Fabillaran, J)
5
McGREGOR W. SCOTT
United States Attorney
AUDREY B. HEMESATH
Assistant United States Attorney
501 I Street, Suite 10-100
Sacramento, CA 95814
Telephone: (916) 554-2700
Email: Audrey.Hemesath@usdoj.gov
6
Attorneys for Defendants
1
2
3
4
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
ABDOUL BA,
10
Plaintiff,
11
12
13
14
15
v.
JEFFERSON SESSIONS III, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 2:13-cv-1005 MCE AC
STATUS REPORT; JOINT
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE:
ABEYANCE
16
17
18
19
20
21
This is an immigration case currently held in abeyance while plaintiff is in removal
proceedings. The parties report that removal proceedings have now concluded, and United
States Citizenship and Immigration Services has administratively reopened plaintiff’s
naturalization application. Plaintiff has been reinterviewed in relation to that application, and a
22
decision on the application is expected shortly. Because the decision by USCIS on the
23
naturalization application will have bearing on this lawsuit, the parties stipulate and agree to
24
25
26
continue to hold the matter in abeyance pending a decision by USCIS. De Lara Bellajaro v.
Schiltgen, 378 F.3d 1042, 1043, 44 (9th Cir. 2004).
27
28
1
1
2
Dated: June 20, 2018
Respectfully submitted,
3
McGREGOR W. SCOTT
United States Attorney
4
s/ Audrey B. Hemesath
AUDREY B. HEMESATH
Assistant United States Attorney
5
6
7
s/ Clifford Chigbu
CLIFFORD CHIGBU
Attorney for the Plaintiff
8
9
10
11
12
13
ORDER
14
15
16
17
18
For the foregoing reasons, the case remains held in abeyance. The parties shall submit a
joint status report on or before September 7, 2018.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: July 2, 2018
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?