Brown et al v. City of Stockton et al
Filing
34
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 9/12/16 ORDERING that the Settlement Conference is CONTINUED to 3/23/2017 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 26 (AC) before Magistrate Judge Allison Claire. (Kastilahn, A)
5
JOHN L. BURRIS, Esq., SBN 69888
BEN NISENBAUM, Esq. SBN 222173
LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS
Airport Corporate Center
7677 Oakport Street, Suite 1120
Oakland, California 94621
Telephone: (510) 839-5200 Facsimile: (510) 839-3882
John.Burris@johnburrislaw.com
6
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
1
2
3
4
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
) Case No.: 2-13-CV-01007-KJM-KJN
SHAWNA BROWN, individually and as
successor-in-interest for Decedent LUTHER )
)
BROWN; A.B., a minor, by and through her )
guardian ad litem, SHAWNA BROWN; D.P., )
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE
a minor, by and through her guardian ad litem, )
SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE;
RITA ALMENDAREZ; A.B., a minor, by and )
) AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
through her guardian ad litem, RITA
)
ALMENDAREZ; D.P., a minor, by and
)
through his guardian ad litem, RITA
)
ALMENDAREZ; S.S.J., a minor, by and
)
through her guardian ad litem, GAYLE
)
)
JOHNSON; and QUEEN E. BROWN,
)
individually.
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
v.
)
)
CITY OF STOCKTON, a municipal
)
corporation; WESKEY GRINDER,
)
individually; RYAN TAIRIOL individually; )
LOREEN GAMBOA, individually; ‘FNU’
)
)
SCOTT, individually; and DOES 1-50,
)
inclusive, individually,
)
)
Defendants.
)
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between plaintiffs SHAWNA BROWN, et al.,
27
28
1
1
(“Plaintiffs”) and WESLEY GRINDER, et al., (“Defendants”), by and through their
2
3
attorneys of record, that GOOD CAUSE exists and the parties respectfully request that the
4
Court continue the Settlement Conference, in the above-entitled action presently set for
5
6
September 15, 2016 to a new date of the Court’s convenience not sooner than November
7
8
15, 2016.
9
10
During the pendency of this case, counsels for the parties have worked diligently to
11
prepare their cases in accordance with the Court’s Pretrial Scheduling Order. The case to
12
13
date has been handled for the defense by the City Attorney’s office. However,
14
15
the primary attorney working on the case, Ted Wood, is no longer with the City
16
17
18
Attorney’s Office and the City Attorney’s Office is in the process of retaining
outside counsel to handle the defense.
19
20
As such, the parties cannot conduct a meaningful Settlement Conference until
21
22
outside counsel has been retained and become familiar with the case. The
23
24
25
parties anticipate that will take up to two months. The requested two-month
extension will not impact the trial date of this action, currently set for August
26
27
28, 2017.
28
2
Based on the foregoing, the parties respectfully request that this Court
1
2
3
continue the Settlement Conference to a new date of the Court’s convenience
4
not sooner than November 15, 2016.
5
6
Respectfully submitted,
7
8
Dated: September 6, 2016
9
10
11
12
Dated: September 7, 2016
13
14
15
16
17
/s/ Benjamin Nisenbaum
Benjamin Nisenbaum, Esq.
LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS
Attorney for Plaintiffs
SHAWNA BROWN, et al.
/s/ James Wilson
(as authorized on September 7, 2016)
James F. Wilson, Deputy City Attorney
Attorney for Defendants
Wesley Grinder, et al.
ATTORNEY ATTESTATION
I hereby attest that I have on file all holograph signatures for any signatures indicated
18
19
by a conformed signature (“/s/”) within this E-filed document or been authorized by all
20
counsel to show his or her signature on this Stipulation as /s/.
21
///
22
///
23
///
24
///
25
26
27
///
///
28
3
1
ORDER
2
Having reviewed the Stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing, IT IS
3
4
HEREBY ORDERED that the Settlement Conference is hereby continued from
September 15, 2016 at 9:00 a.m. to a new date of Thursday, March 23, 2017, at 9:00 a.m.
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
8
Dated: September 12, 2016
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?