Coleman v. California Department of Correction and Rehabilitation et al

Filing 111

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/18/16 denying 101 Motion to Appoint Counsel. (Plummer, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

ROBERT COLEMAN,

12
13
14
15
16

No. 2:13-cv-1021 JAM KJN P

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS AND
REHABILITATION, et al.,
Defendants.

17
18
19
20

Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se, in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. §
1983. Plaintiff renews his request that the court appoint counsel.
District courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in section

21

1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In exceptional

22

circumstances, the court may request an attorney to voluntarily represent such a plaintiff. See 28

23

U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v.

24

Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). When determining whether “exceptional

25

circumstances” exist, the court must consider plaintiff’s likelihood of success on the merits as

26

well as the ability of the plaintiff to articulate his claims pro se in light of the complexity of the

27

legal issues involved. Palmer v. Valdez, 560 F.3d 965, 970 (9th Cir. 2009) (district court did not

28

abuse discretion in declining to appoint counsel). The burden of demonstrating exceptional
1

1

circumstances is on the plaintiff. Id. Circumstances common to most prisoners, such as lack of

2

legal education and limited law library access, do not establish exceptional circumstances that

3

warrant a request for voluntary assistance of counsel.

4

Having considered the factors under Palmer, the court finds that plaintiff has failed to

5

meet his burden of demonstrating exceptional circumstances warranting the appointment of

6

counsel at this time.

7

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s second motion for the

8

appointment of counsel (ECF No. 101) is denied without prejudice.

9

Dated: October 18, 2016

10
11
12
/cole1021.31

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2