In Re: Estrella and James Kincaid

Filing 22

ORDER denying 20 EX PARTE APPLICATION for Extension of time signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 12/3/14. (Kaminski, H)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 JAMES KINCAID and ESTELLA KINCAID, Appellants, 13 14 15 16 No. 2:13-cv-01032-TLN ORDER v. SUSAN K. SMITH AND THE OFFICE OF THE U.S. TRUSTEE, Trustees. 17 18 This case was originally brought before this Court on May 24, 2013. (See Notice of 19 Bankruptcy Appeal, ECF No. 1.) On August 20, 2014, the Deputy Clerk of the U.S. Bankruptcy 20 Court of the Eastern District of California certified that the record with respect to Appellants 21 James Kincaid and Estella Kincaid (“Appellants”) was complete for purposes of this appeal. 22 (ECF No. 17.) Pursuant to Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 8009, Appellants’ opening 23 brief and excerpts of record were due, filed in the district court, within fourteen (14) days of the 24 certification. (ECF No. 17.) On September 5, 2014, Appellants filed a motion for a fourteen 25 (14) week extension to file their opening brief. (ECF No. 18.) The Court granted this request, 26 but warned Appellants that the Court would not grant any further extension. (See Minute Order, 27 ECF No. 19.) Hence, Appellants’ opening brief is due on December 10, 2014. 28 On December 1, 2014, Appellants filed an ex parte application requesting another 1 1 extension. (ECF No. 20.) The Court has reviewed the application as well as the memorandum of 2 points and authorities in support of the application. Appellants have failed to show good cause 3 for another extension, especially in light of the Court’s previous admonishment. Accordingly, 4 Appellants’ request for an extension (ECF No. 20) is DENIED. 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 8 Dated: December 3, 2014 9 10 11 12 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?