Saling v. Royal, et al

Filing 34

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 3/19/14 ORDERING that Plaintiff's MOTION to Amend the Complaint 28 is GRANTED. Defendants' 7 MOTION to DISMISS is DENIED; Plaintiff shall file a First Amended Complaint by 6/2/2014. Defendants shall file a response to Plantiff's First Amended Complaint by 7/2/2014. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

TAMMY SALING,

11
12
13
14
15
16

No. 2:13-cv-1039-TLN-EFB PS

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER

KEITH ROYAL, Sheriff of Nevada
County, California; GAYLE
SATCHWELL, Former Director of Human
Resources, Nevada County,
Defendants.

17
18

On March 19, 2014, the court heard defendants’ motion to dismiss, ECF No. 7, and

19

plaintiff’s motion for leave to file an amended complaint, ECF No. 28. Plaintiff appeared pro se;

20

attorney Alison Barratt-Green appeared on behalf of defendants.

21

For the reasons stated on the record, plaintiff’s motion to amend the complaint is granted.

22

As a result, defendants’ motion to dismiss is denied as moot. Plaintiff shall file a first amended

23

complaint by June 2, 2014. The amended complaint shall be responsive to the defects in the

24

existing complaint that were identified on the record at the hearing. Defendants shall file a

25

response to plaintiff’s first amended complaint by July 2, 2014.

26

So Ordered.

27

DATED: March 19, 2014.

28