New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC v. City of Vallejo, CA

Filing 20

ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 7/8/14. This case is ORDERED DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk is directed to close this case.(Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 GREGORY B. MOUROUX (SBN: 231948) JOHN DI BENE (SBN: 177359) AT&T SERVICES, INC. – LEGAL DEPT. 525 Market Street, Suite 2009 San Francisco, CA 94105 Phone: (415) 778-1359 Fax: (415) 882-4458 Email: gm744n@att.com jdb@att.com ANDREW C. EMERSON, Pro Hac Vice AARON M. SHANK, Pro Hac Vice PORTER WRIGHT MORRIS & ARTHUR, LLP 41 South High Street Columbus, OH 43215 Phone: (614) 227-2000 Fax: (614) 227-2100 Email: aemerson@porterwright.com ashank@porterwright.com Attorneys for Plaintiff New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC d/b/a AT&T Mobility CLAUDIA M. QUINTANA, City Attorney (SBN: 178613) KELLY J. TRUJILLO, Deputy City Attorney (SBN: 244286) CITY OF VALLEJO, City Hall 555 Santa Clara Street, P.O. Box 3068 Vallejo, CA 94590 Tel: (707) 648-4545 Fax: (707) 648-4687 Email: kelly.trujillo@cityofvallejo.net Attorneys for Defendant City of Vallejo 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 20 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 21 22 23 NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC, D/B/A AT&T MOBILITY, a Delaware corporation, 26 27 ORDER Plaintiff, 24 25 Case No. 2:13-CV-01065-MCE-KJN Judge: Hon. Morrison C. England, Jr. v. Complaint filed: May 29, 2013 CITY OF VALLEJO, a California municipal corporation, Defendant. 28 -1ORDER Trial: Not yet scheduled 1 ORDER 2 In consideration of the Stipulation of Dismissal filed by the parties to this action on July 1, 3 2014, and good cause being shown, this case is ordered dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk of 4 the Court is directed to close this case. 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 7 Dated: July 8, 2014 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 609550 -2ORDER Case No. 2:13-CV-01065-MCE-KJN

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?