New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC v. City of Vallejo, CA
Filing
20
ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 7/8/14. This case is ORDERED DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk is directed to close this case.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
GREGORY B. MOUROUX (SBN: 231948)
JOHN DI BENE (SBN: 177359)
AT&T SERVICES, INC. – LEGAL DEPT.
525 Market Street, Suite 2009
San Francisco, CA 94105
Phone: (415) 778-1359
Fax:
(415) 882-4458
Email: gm744n@att.com
jdb@att.com
ANDREW C. EMERSON, Pro Hac Vice
AARON M. SHANK, Pro Hac Vice
PORTER WRIGHT MORRIS & ARTHUR, LLP
41 South High Street
Columbus, OH 43215
Phone: (614) 227-2000
Fax: (614) 227-2100
Email: aemerson@porterwright.com
ashank@porterwright.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC d/b/a AT&T Mobility
CLAUDIA M. QUINTANA, City Attorney (SBN: 178613)
KELLY J. TRUJILLO, Deputy City Attorney (SBN: 244286)
CITY OF VALLEJO, City Hall
555 Santa Clara Street, P.O. Box 3068
Vallejo, CA 94590
Tel: (707) 648-4545
Fax: (707) 648-4687
Email: kelly.trujillo@cityofvallejo.net
Attorneys for Defendant City of Vallejo
19
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
20
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
21
22
23
NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC,
D/B/A AT&T MOBILITY, a Delaware
corporation,
26
27
ORDER
Plaintiff,
24
25
Case No. 2:13-CV-01065-MCE-KJN
Judge: Hon. Morrison C. England, Jr.
v.
Complaint filed: May 29, 2013
CITY OF VALLEJO, a California municipal
corporation,
Defendant.
28
-1ORDER
Trial: Not yet scheduled
1
ORDER
2
In consideration of the Stipulation of Dismissal filed by the parties to this action on July 1,
3
2014, and good cause being shown, this case is ordered dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk of
4
the Court is directed to close this case.
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
7
Dated: July 8, 2014
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
609550
-2ORDER
Case No. 2:13-CV-01065-MCE-KJN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?