Johnson et al v. The City of Vallejo et al

Filing 25

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 6/5/2014 ORDERING 24 The parties to this action hereby stipulate to the procedure set forth below for transferring biological samples of the deceased, Mario D.S.M. Romero, from the Solano Co unty Coroner's Office to a laboratory designated in this Order for the purpose of obtaining DNA information. All the parties stipulate to the foregoing and to the chain of custody identified in the Order. Written results of all DNA testing will be provided to all parties to this action. All fees for the referenced DNA testing, including delivery costs are to be paid by Bowles & Verna. (Reader, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 MICHAEL P. VERNA (# 84070) LAWRENCE D. GOLDBERG (# 168142) BOWLES & VERNA LLP 2121 N. California Blvd., Suite 875 Walnut Creek, California 94596 Telephone: (925) 935-3300 Facsimile: (925) 935-0371 Email: mverna@bowlesverna.com lgoldberg@bowlesverna.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs JOSEPH L. JOHNSON and CYNTHIA A. MITCHELL, individually and as successor-in-interest and personal representative of decedent MARIO D. S .M. ROMERO 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 10 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 JOSEPH L. JOHNSON, an individual, CYNTHIA A. MITCHELL, an individual, and as successor-in13 interest and personal representative of decedent MARIO D. S .M. ROMERO, 14 15 16 CASE NO. 2:13-cv-01072-JAM-KJN STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING TESTING OF BIOLOGICAL SAMPLES Plaintiffs, vs. 17 THE CITY OF VALLEJO, a municipality and charter city; POLICE OFFICER DUSTIN B. 18 JOSEPH, an individual, POLICE OFFICER SEAN G. KENNEY, an individual, VALLEJO CHIEF OF 19 POLICE JOSEPH M. KREINS, an individual and DOES 1-5 inclusive, 20 Defendants. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Bowles & Verna LLP 2121 N. California Suite 875 Walnut Creek 94596 The parties to this action hereby stipulate to the procedure set forth below for transferring biological samples of the deceased, Mario D.S.M. Romero, from the Solano County Coroner’s Office to a laboratory designated in the Order below for the purpose of obtaining DNA information. All the parties stipulate to the foregoing and to the chain of custody identified in the Order as follows: GOOD CAUSE having been made to appear and pursuant to the stipulation of all counsel it is ordered that: Genex Diagnostics, Inc., #180-4616 25th Avenue NE, Seattle, 1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING TESTING OF BIOLOGICAL SAMPLES 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Washington 98105 will overnight a DNA test kit directly to the Solano County Coroner’s Office at 530 Union Avenue, Suite 100, Fairfield, CA 94533, Phone: 707784-7000, via Federal Express. An official at the Solano County Coroner’s Office will sign for the test kit to maintain the chain of custody. An official from the Coroner’s Office will then submit a blood spot card in the test kit pursuant to the directions by Genex Diagnostics, and the blood on the blood spot card will be blood taken from the decedent Mario D.S.M. Romero. The Solano County Coroner’s Officer will verify prior to providing the sample from the decedent that more blood samples from the decedent Mario D.S.M. Romero are available and will be preserved. The Solano County Coroner’s Office official will then overnight the test kit and the blood spot card to Genex Diagnostics via Federal Express. Upon receipt of the test kit and the blood spot card, an official from Genex Diagnostics will sign for the test kit and the blood spot card to ensure that the chain of custody is maintained. Genex Diagnostics will then perform a blood test to confirm that it has adequate blood samples on the blood spot card to perform a DNA test on Mario D.S.M. Romero. Once it confirms that fact, it will perform the DNA test, and upon completion of the DNA testing, the results of all testing reports shall be sent to William Nagle at Bowles & Verna LLP, 2121 North California Boulevard, Suite 875, Walnut Creek, California 94596, to Catherine Haley at the Law Offices of Catherine Haley, 1633 San Pablo Avenue, Oakland, California 94612, and to Mark A. Jones at Jones & Dyer, 1800 J Street, Sacramento, California 95811. After the completion of all the testing, the blood spot card can be destroyed. Upon completion of the DNA test, a swab of Namaria Romero’s saliva will be sent by Natasha Romero on behalf of the minor Namaria Romero directly to Genex Diagnostics in Vallejo California. A swab of Natasha Romero’s saliva will also be sent directly to Genex Diagnostics in Vallejo California. Written results of all DNA testing will be provided to all parties to this action. 28 2 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING TESTING OF BIOLOGICAL SAMPLES 1 2 All fees for the above-referenced DNA testing, including delivery costs are to be paid by Bowles & Verna. 3 4 Dated: June 5, 2014 JONES & DYER 5 6 By: /s/____________________________________ Mark A. Jones Kristen K. Preston Attorneys for Defendants City of Vallejo, D. Joseph, S. Kenney and J. Kreins 7 8 9 10 Dated: June 5, 2014 CITY OF VALLEJO 11 12 By: /s/____________________________________ Claudia Quintana Kelly J. Trujillo Attorneys for Defendants City of Vallejo, D. Joseph, S. Kenny, and J. Kreins 13 14 15 16 17 Dated: June 5, 2014 BOWLES & VERNA LLP 18 19 By: /s/____________________________________ Lawrence Goldberg William Nagle Attorneys for Plaintiffs 20 21 22 23 Dated: June 5, 2014 THE HALEY LAW OFFICES, P.C. LAW OFFICES OF CATHERINE HALEY 24 25 26 27 By: /s/____________________________________ Matthew D. Haley Catherine Haley Attorneys for Plaintiffs 28 3 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING TESTING OF BIOLOGICAL SAMPLES 1 2 ORDER IT IS SO ORDERED. 3 4 Dated: 6/5/2014 5 /s/ John A. Mendez_________ U.S. District Court Judge 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING TESTING OF BIOLOGICAL SAMPLES

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?