Johnson et al v. The City of Vallejo et al

Filing 50

STIPULATION and ORDER Regarding Data Recovery form Cellular Phones, signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/29/14. (Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 CLAUDIA QUINTANA City Attorney, SBN 178613 BY: KELLY J. TRUJILLO Deputy City Attorney, SBN 244286 CITY OF VALLEJO, City Hall 555 Santa Clara Street, P.O. Box 3068 Vallejo, CA 94590 Tel: (707) 648-4545 Fax: (707) 648-4687 MARK A. JONES, SBN 96494 KRISTEN K. PRESTON, SBN 125455 JONES & DYER A Professional Corporation 1800 J Street Sacramento, CA 95811 Tel: (916) 552-5959 Fax: (916) 442-5959 10 11 Attorneys for Defendants City of Vallejo, Officer Dustin B. Joseph, Officer Sean G. Kenney and Vallejo Chief of Police Joseph M. Kreins 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 15 16 17 JOSEPH L. JOHNSON, an individual, CYNTHIA A. MITCHELL, an individual, and as successor-in-interest and personal representative of decedent MARIO D.S.M. ROMERO, 18 Plaintiffs, 19 23 THE CITY OF VALLEJO, a municipality and charter city, POLICE OFFICER DUSTIN B. JOSEPH, an individual, POLICE OFFICER SEAN G. KENNEY, an individual, VALLEJO CHIEF OF POLICE JOSEPH M. KREINS, an individual and DOES 1-5, inclusive, 24 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE DATA RECOVERY FROM CELLULAR TELEPHONES vs. 20 Case No.: 2:13-CV-01072-JAM-KJN (Consolidated with Case No.: 2:13-CV02060-JAM-KJN) Defendants. 21 22 25 26 AND CONSOLIDATED ACTIONS ___________________________________ 27 28 The parties to this action hereby stipulate to the procedure set forth below for transferring cellular telephones described in Report No. 1211085.6 as Property Items 15 and 16 consisting of a NW5 1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 Samsung Metro PCS cell phone and a NW6 Metro PCS cell phone from the Vallejo Police Department 2 to the forensic examiner designated in the Order below for the purpose of data recovery within the scope 3 described in the Order. All the parties stipulate to the foregoing and to the chain of custody identified in 4 the Order as follows: 5 6 7 GOOD CAUSE having been made to appear and pursuant to the stipulation of all counsel it is ordered that: The Vallejo Police Department will release to Jones & Dyer cellular telephones described in 8 Report No. 1211085.6 as Property Items 15 and 16 consisting of a NW5 Samsung Metro PCS cell phone 9 and a NW6 Metro PCS cell phone. A representative of Jones & Dyer will sign a receipt for the evidence 10 to maintain the chain of custody. A representative of Jones & Dyer will then deliver the evidence to 11 California Data Recovery, Inc. at 9139 Haverton Court, Elk Grove, California. A representative of 12 California Data Recovery, Inc. will sign a receipt for the evidence to maintain chain of custody. Upon 13 receipt of the evidence, a certified forensic examiner will retrieve available data from each cellular 14 telephone including but not limited to text messages, instant messages, telephone numbers, voice mail 15 messages or any other retrievable data for the period including from September 1, 2012 at 4:30 a.m. to 16 September 3, 2012 at 4:30 a.m. 17 Upon completion of the data recovery, a report detailing the results and content shall be 18 simultaneously sent by California Data Recovery, Inc. to counsel of record. The report detailing the 19 results and content of data retrieved shall be designated “Confidential Material” pursuant to the 20 Protective Order previously issued by this court [Docket No. 13] except that the report may be disclosed 21 only to the following persons: 22 a. Counsel for any party to this action. 23 b. Paralegal, stenographic, clerical and secretarial personnel regularly 24 25 employed by counsel referred to in 4(a); c. Court personnel including stenographic reporters engaged in such 26 proceedings as are necessarily incidental to preparation for the trial of this 27 action; 28 2 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 d. 2 Any outside expert or consultant retained in connection with this action, and not otherwise employed by either party; and 3 e. 4 The parties agree that at the time of trial Plaintiffs may seek orders from the Court to prevent 5 Any expert designated to testify at trial in this matter. confidential materials disclosed during discovery from being made public during a jury trial. 6 After the completion of the data recovery, the evidence will be returned to and maintained by the 7 Vallejo Police Department. A representative of the Vallejo Police Department will sign a receipt for the 8 evidence to maintain chain of custody. 9 All fees for the above-referenced data retrieval are to be paid by Jones & Dyer. 10 No objection shall be raised by any party regarding admissibility at trial of the evidence related 11 to the data recovery described in this order on the basis that the data recovery and production of the 12 report occur after the close of discovery. All other objections to admissibility of evidence pertaining to 13 the data recovery described in this order are preserved. 14 Dated: October 28, 2014 JONES & DYER 15 16 By: 17 18 19 20 Dated: October 28, 2014 /s/ Kristen K. Preston Mark A. Jones Kristen K. Preston Attorneys for Defendants City of Vallejo, D. Joseph, S. Kenney and J. Kreins CITY OF VALLEJO 21 22 By: 23 24 /s/ Kelly J. Trujillo Claudia Quintana Kelly J. Trujillo Attorneys for Defendants City of Vallejo, D. Joseph, S. Kenny, and J. Kreins 25 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 3 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER . 1 Dated: October 28, 2014 BOWLES & VERNA LLP 2 By: 3 4 /s/ William Nagle Lawrence Goldberg William Nagle Attorneys for Plaintiffs . 5 6 Dated: October 28, 2014 THE HALEY LAW OFFICES, P.C. LAW OFFICES OF CATHERINE HALEY 7 8 By: /s/ Matthew D. Haley Matthew D. Haley Catherine Haley Attorneys for Plaintiffs 9 10 . 11 12 Dated: October 28, 2014 LAW OFFICE OF FULVIO F. CAJINA 13 14 By: /s/ Fulvio F. Cajina Fulvio F. Cajina Attorney for Plaintiffs 15 16 17 ORDER 18 19 IT IS SO ORDERED. 20 21 Dated: October 29, 2014 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER .

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?