Guyton v. Brazelton
Filing
10
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 11-25-13 denying 9 Motion for Reconsideration. (Dillon, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
FRANCISCO GAILE GUYTON,
12
13
14
No. 2:13-cv-1095-EFB P
Petitioner,
v.
ORDER
P.D. BRAZELTON,
15
Respondent.
16
17
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42
18
U.S.C. § 1983. On October 22, 2013, the undersigned dismissed this action for lack of
19
jurisdiction and judgment was duly entered. ECF Nos. 7, 8. Petitioner now moves for
20
reconsideration of the order of dismissal. ECF No. 9.
21
Reconsideration is appropriate if the court (1) is presented with newly discovered
22
evidence, (2) committed clear error or the initial decision was manifestly unjust, or (3) if there is
23
an intervening change in controlling law. Sch. Dist. No. 1J v. ACandS, Inc., 5 F.3d 1255, 1263
24
(9th Cir. 1993). Additionally, Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides as
25
follows:
26
27
28
On motion and just terms, the court may relieve a party or its legal representative
from a final judgment, order, or proceeding for the following reasons: (1) mistake,
inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect; (2) newly discovered evidence that,
with reasonable diligence, could not have been discovered in time to move for a
1
1
2
3
new trial under rule 59(b); (3) fraud (whether previously called intrinsic or
extrinsic), misrepresentation, or misconduct by an opposing party; (4) the
judgment is void; (5) the judgment has been satisfied, released or discharged; it is
based on an earlier judgment that has been reversed or vacated; or applying it
prospectively is no longer equitable; or (6) any other reason that justifies relief.
4
5
Petitioner has not shown that circumstances exist to justify the requested relief.
6
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner’s motion for reconsideration (ECF No.
7
9) is denied.
8
Dated: November 25, 2013.
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?