Gill et al v. Vaillancourt et al

Filing 24

ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 3/10/14 ORDERING that this action is now DISMISSED with prejudice, and the Clerk is directed to close this case. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 GURMUKH SINGH GILL, et al., 12 Plaintiffs, 13 14 No. 2:13-CV-01114-MCE-EFB v. ORDER SCOTT VAILLANCOURT, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 On January 14, 2014, this Court dismissed Plaintiffs’ operative complaint with 17 18 leave to amend. See ECF No. 23. The Court made clear, however, that if no amended 19 complaint was filed within thirty (30) days of the filing of that Order, the complaint would 20 be dismissed with prejudice upon no further notice to the parties. 21 /// 22 /// 23 //// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 1 No amended complaint has been filed. Accordingly, pursuant to the Court’s prior Order, 2 this action is now DISMISSED with prejudice, and the Clerk of the Court is directed to 3 close this case. 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 10, 2014 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?