Gill et al v. Vaillancourt et al
Filing
24
ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 3/10/14 ORDERING that this action is now DISMISSED with prejudice, and the Clerk is directed to close this case. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
GURMUKH SINGH GILL, et al.,
12
Plaintiffs,
13
14
No. 2:13-CV-01114-MCE-EFB
v.
ORDER
SCOTT VAILLANCOURT, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
On January 14, 2014, this Court dismissed Plaintiffs’ operative complaint with
17
18
leave to amend. See ECF No. 23. The Court made clear, however, that if no amended
19
complaint was filed within thirty (30) days of the filing of that Order, the complaint would
20
be dismissed with prejudice upon no further notice to the parties.
21
///
22
///
23
////
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
1
No amended complaint has been filed. Accordingly, pursuant to the Court’s prior Order,
2
this action is now DISMISSED with prejudice, and the Clerk of the Court is directed to
3
close this case.
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 10, 2014
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?