Morris v. Jennings et al.
Filing
15
ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 9/3/2014 ADOPTING in full the 6/13/2014 findings and recommendations 13 ; petitioner's verbal harassment claim raised in his First Amended Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. (Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
LEON E. MORRIS,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:13-cv-1134 MCE AC P
v.
ORDER
JENNINGS, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief
18
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
19
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On June 13, 2014, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein (ECF
20
21
No. 13) which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any
22
objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. Neither
23
party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly:
1. The Findings and Recommendations filed June 13, 2014, ECF No. 13, are ADOPTED
IN FULL; and
2. Petitioner’s verbal harassment claim raised in his First Amendment Complaint is
DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: September 3, 2014
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?