Hamilton v. Mule Creek State Prison, et al.
Filing
46
ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 9/29/17: The findings and recommendations 43 , ARE ADOPTED IN FULL. Motion to Dismiss 20 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Defendants J. Buckard, C. Heintschel, and I. Reyes are DISMISSED with prejudice. (Kaminski, H)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DAVID HAMILTON,
12
13
14
No. 2:13-CV-1143-MCE-CMK-P
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
K. SUTTERFIELD, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C.
18
§ 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Eastern District
19
of California local rules.
20
On September 8, 2017, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations herein
21
which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file objections
22
within a specified time. ECF No. 43. Timely objections to the findings and recommendations
23
have been filed. ECF No. 45.
24
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304(f), this
25
Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the
26
Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper
27
analysis.
28
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1
1
2
3
4
1.
The findings and recommendations filed September 8, 2017 (ECF No. 43), ARE
ADOPTED IN FULL;
2.
Defendants’ motion to dismiss (ECF No. 20) is GRANTED IN PART and
DENIED IN PART;
5
3.
Plaintiff’s due process claim is DISMISSED with prejudice;
6
4.
Plaintiff’s First Amendment claim is DISMISSED with prejudice;
7
5
Defendants J. Buckard, C. Heintschel, and I. Reyes are DISMISSED with
8
prejudice;
9
6.
This action shall proceed on plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment claim as against the
10
remaining defendants who shall file an answer to plaintiff’s first amended complaint within thirty
11
(30) days of the date of electronic filing of this order; and
12
7.
13
IT IS SO ORDERED.
14
The matter is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings.
Dated: September 29, 2017
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?