Hamilton v. Mule Creek State Prison, et al.

Filing 68

ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 10/24/2018 DENYING 62 Motion for Reconsideration and AFFIRMING 58 Order on Motion to Compel. No further motions for reconsideration of this order will be considered. (Washington, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

DAVID HAMILTON,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 2:13-cv-1143-MCE-DMC-P

v.

ORDER

SUTTERFIELD, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
17
18

Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C.

19

§ 1983. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration (ECF No. 62) seeking

20

reconsideration of the Magistrate Judge’s August 10, 2018 order (ECF No. 58) denying Plaintiff’s

21

Motion to Compel (ECF No. 54).
Pursuant to Eastern District of California Local Rule 303(f), a Magistrate Judge’s order

22
23

shall be upheld unless “clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” Upon review of the entire file, the

24

Court finds that the Magistrate Judge’s ruling was not clearly erroneous or contrary to law. The

25

August 10, 2018 order (ECF No. 58) is therefore AFFIRMED.

26

///

27

///

28

///
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

2

1.

Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration (ECF No. 62) is DENIED;

3

2.

The Magistrate Judge’s August 10, 2018 order (ECF No. 58) is AFFIRMED; and

4

3.

No further motions for reconsideration of this order will be considered.

5

IT IS SO ORDERED.

6

Dated: October 24, 2018

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2