Sisco et al v. Weed Union Elementary School District et al
Filing
9
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 6/12/2013 DENYING 8 Plaintiffs' Application to Appoint Guardian ad Litem. (Reader, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
JANE DOE, by and through her
Guardian ad Litem, David Sisco;
DAVID SISCO; and KATHLEEN
WILDER,
12
Plaintiffs,
13
14
v.
16
WEED UNION ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
DISTRICT, LEEANNA RIZZO, ALISA
CUMMINGS, COUNTY OF SISKIYOU,
and DEPUTY SHERIFF CARL HOUTMAN,
17
Defendants.
________________________________
15
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
2:13-cv-01145-GEB-CMK
ORDER
18
19
On June 12, 2013, Plaintiffs filed an “Exparte Application for
20
Appointment of Guardian Ad Litem for Plaintiff Jane Doe.” (ECF No. 8.)
21
Plaintiffs have not shown justification to use a pseudonym on behalf of
22
the minor plaintiff. (See Order 2 n.2, June 12, 2013, ECF No. 7.)
23
Further, as explained by the undersigned judge’s June 12, 2013 Order,
24
which was filed on the pubic docket more than an hour before Plaintiffs
25
filed the instant application, Plaintiffs have not shown a “need for the
26
court to appoint a guardian ad litem” in this case. Croce v. Bromley
27
Corp., 623 F.2d 1084, 1093 (5th Cir. 1980); see Order, ECF No. 7.
28
///
1
1
For the stated reasons, Plaintiffs’ application (ECF No. 8) is
2
DENIED.
3
Dated:
June 12, 2013
4
5
6
GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.
Senior United States District Judge
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?