Sisco et al v. Weed Union Elementary School District et al

Filing 9

ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 6/12/2013 DENYING 8 Plaintiffs' Application to Appoint Guardian ad Litem. (Reader, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 JANE DOE, by and through her Guardian ad Litem, David Sisco; DAVID SISCO; and KATHLEEN WILDER, 12 Plaintiffs, 13 14 v. 16 WEED UNION ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT, LEEANNA RIZZO, ALISA CUMMINGS, COUNTY OF SISKIYOU, and DEPUTY SHERIFF CARL HOUTMAN, 17 Defendants. ________________________________ 15 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2:13-cv-01145-GEB-CMK ORDER 18 19 On June 12, 2013, Plaintiffs filed an “Exparte Application for 20 Appointment of Guardian Ad Litem for Plaintiff Jane Doe.” (ECF No. 8.) 21 Plaintiffs have not shown justification to use a pseudonym on behalf of 22 the minor plaintiff. (See Order 2 n.2, June 12, 2013, ECF No. 7.) 23 Further, as explained by the undersigned judge’s June 12, 2013 Order, 24 which was filed on the pubic docket more than an hour before Plaintiffs 25 filed the instant application, Plaintiffs have not shown a “need for the 26 court to appoint a guardian ad litem” in this case. Croce v. Bromley 27 Corp., 623 F.2d 1084, 1093 (5th Cir. 1980); see Order, ECF No. 7. 28 /// 1 1 For the stated reasons, Plaintiffs’ application (ECF No. 8) is 2 DENIED. 3 Dated: June 12, 2013 4 5 6 GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. Senior United States District Judge 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?