Walker v. Mohadjer et al
Filing
32
ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 9/12/13 ORDERING that the FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS filed 8/6/13 20 are ADOPTED in full; and Plaintiff's MOTIONS for immediate injunctive relief 13 and 17 are DENIED.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JEFFREY E. WALKER,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:13-cv-1193 WBS AC P
v.
ORDER
MOHADJER, Clinical Psychologist, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief
18
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
19
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On August 6, 2013, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein
20
21
which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to
22
the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed
23
objections to the findings and recommendations.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this
24
25
court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the
26
court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper
27
analysis.
28
\\\\
1
1
Accord
dingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
S
O
2
1. The findings an recommen
e
nd
ndations file August 6, 2013, are ad
ed
dopted in ful and
ll;
3
2. Pla
aintiff’s moti
ions for imm
mediate injun
nctive relief (ECF Nos. 1 and 17) a denied.
13
are
4
Da
ated: Septem
mber 12, 201
13
5
6
7
8
alk1193.805
/wa
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?