Honable v. Warden

Filing 9

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 08/08/13 ordering that petitioner shall comply with the court's 6/24/13 order within 21 days from the date of this order. (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CARLOS HONABLE, 12 13 14 15 No. 2:13-cv-1203 JAM KJN P Petitioner, v. ORDER M.D. McDONALD, Respondent. 16 17 By order filed June 24, 2013, petitioner was directed to file an affidavit in support of his 18 request to proceed in forma pauperis or to pay the appropriate filing fee. The order was re-served 19 on July 9, 2013. On July 17, 2013, petitioner filed a notice that he would pay the filing fee, and 20 appended a copy of his inmate trust account statement reflecting that on June 27, 2013, $5.00 was 21 deducted from petitioner’s account for “legal mail.” (ECF No. 5 at 2.) On July 19, 2013, 22 petitioner filed a letter claiming that the court should have received the filing fee. (ECF No. 6.) 23 However, to date, this court has not received a $5.00 payment from petitioner. The trust 24 account statement does not indicate to whom the $5.00 was sent, and no case number is reflected 25 on the withdrawal entry. (ECF No. 5 at 2.) 26 Accordingly, petitioner is granted an extension of time in which to respond to the June 24, 27 2013 order. Petitioner is cautioned that failure to comply with this court’s June 24, 2013 order 28 will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. 1 1 Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner shall comply with this 2 court’s June 24, 2013 order within twenty-one days from the date of this order. Failure to comply 3 with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. 4 Dated: August 8, 2013 5 6 7 8 hona1203.111 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?