Reynolds v. Davis, et al.
Filing
12
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 02/21/14 recommending that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MICHAEL REYNOLDS,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:13-cv-1205 GEB CKD P
v.
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
DAVIS, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
By an order filed November 14, 2013, this court ordered plaintiff to complete and return
17
18
to the court, within thirty days, the USM-285 forms necessary to effect service on defendant.
19
That thirty day period has since passed, and plaintiff has not responded in any way to the court’s
20
order.
IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See
21
22
Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States District Judge
23
24
assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days
25
after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections
26
with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Findings and
27
Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time
28
/////
1
1
may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th
2
Cir. 1991).
3
Dated: February 21, 2014
4
5
2/reyn1205.fusm
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?