Adamov v. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Filing 59

ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 08/07/17 ORDERING that plaintiff's 56 Request for a Status Conference is DENIED. (Benson, A.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 YURY ADAMOV, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:13-cv-01222-TLN-AC v. ORDER PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS, LLP, 15 Defendant. 16 This case involves a labor dispute over alleged wage and hour violations for a proposed 17 18 class of individuals. Plaintiff Yury Adamov (“Plaintiff”) filed a letter with the Court drawing its 19 attention to three matters: a request for a status conference; Defendant PricewaterhouseCoopers’s 20 (“Defendant”) alleged failure to comply with discovery requests; and Defendant’s desire to file a 21 motion for summary judgement prior to the close of the class phase of the litigation. (ECF No. 22 56.) 23 The parties are reminded that any dispute regarding discovery is properly before 24 Magistrate Judge Allison Claire and this Court will not entertain any requests or motions on 25 discovery issues. See Local Rule 302 (c)(1). Furthermore, the Court will not prevent a party 26 from filing a motion. The Court’s Scheduling Order (ECF No. 51) does not preclude parties from 27 filing motions at any time. The Order simply sets deadlines for filings, but does not preclude 28 filings prior to deadlines. 1 1 2 3 Plaintiff has not presented the Court with any valid reason to hold a status conference at this time. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s request is hereby DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 5 Dated: August 7, 2017 6 7 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?