Adamov v. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Filing 72

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 11/21/2017 ORDERING 64 that the motion hearing date of 11/22/2017, at 10:00 AM is VACATED. (Reader, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 YURY ADAMOV, 12 13 14 15 No. 2:13-cv-01222 TLN AC Plaintiff, v. ORDER PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP, Defendant. 16 17 This matter is before the court on Plaitniff’s motion for discovery, ECF No. 64, pursuant 18 to Local Rule 302(c)(1). The court is in receipt of the parties’ stipulation to continue the hearing 19 on the motion to December 6, 2017. ECF No. 71. The court notes that the deadline to complete 20 the first phase of discovery in this bifurcated discovery case is December 7, 2017. ECF No. 65 at 21 2. In the scheduling order issued by District Judge Nunley, “completed” for the purposes of 22 discovery is defined as the point at wich “all disocvery shall have been conducted so that all 23 depositions have been taken and any disputes reletative to discovery shall have been resolved by 24 appropriate order if necessary and, where discovery has been ordered, the order has been 25 obeyed.” ECF No. 51 at 2. The parties’ requested hearing date makes it impossible for the 26 parties or the undersigned to comply with the currently scheduled discovery deadline. 27 28 Thus, the undersigned will VACATE the hearing on plaintiff’s motion for discovery at ECF No. 64 without prejudice. The motion may be renoticed by the plaintiff if the parties obtain 1 1 2 an amended scheduling order from Judge Nunley. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion hearing date of 3 November 22, 2017, at 10:00 a.m. on ECF No. 64 is VACATED. 4 DATED: November 21, 2017 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?