Wilkins v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.

Filing 6

MDL TRANSFER ORDER, CASE TRANSFERRED to District of Minnesota re: MDL No. 2441 (MND Case 13-cv-1909 DWF FLN). (Waggoner, D)

UNITED STATBS JUDICIAL PANEL
on

FILED

MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

Jul 17, 2013

IN RE: STRYKER REJUVENATE AND ABG
HIP IMPLANT PRODUCTS LIABILITY

II

CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LITIGATION

MDL No. 2441

(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)

coNDrTroNAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO -4)

On June 12,2013, the Panel transferred 28 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the
District of Minnesota for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
$1407. See _F.Supp.2d_ (J.P.M.L. 2013). Since that time, 61 additional action(s) have been
transferred to the District of Minnesota. With the consent of that court, all such actions have been
assigned to the Honorable Donovan W Frank.

It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that

are
common to the actions previously transferred to the District of Minnesota and assigned to Judge
Frank.
Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict
Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. $1407 to the
District of Minnesota for the reasons stated in the order of June 12,2013, and, with the consent of
that court, assigned to the Honorable Donovan W Frank.

This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States
District Court for the District of Minnesota. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be
stayed 7 days frorn the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the
Panel within this 7-day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.

FOR THE PANEL:

Jeffery N. Ltithi
Clerk of the Panel
'

1.1 //. .!r'-j1

..;

.'

JuL 1$
U.S Dls-rRrq-I

20v

cC'uLT l'tELS

Case MDL No,

o

244t

Document

211

Filed 07/16/13 Page 2 of 2

II

IN RE: STRYKER REJUVENATE AND ABG
HIP IMPLANT PRODUCTS LIABILITY

LITIGATION

MDL No. 2441

SCHEDULE CTO-4 _ TAG_ALONG ACTIONS

DIST DIV.

CASE CAPTION

C.A.NO.

CALIFORNIA EASTERN

CAE 2
l3-0123s
FLORIDA MIDDLE
A FLM 8
13- otszq :
FLORIDASOUTHERNl'

."O:''

'l

'

,,t : ,: :'i.'.

.

FLS.."' l. '0'. "'i
, .:.'
,:

;

'' .

"r''

"'13-6125l
,,:r

Wilkins v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.

l3cv l9O1 DWf/flrr)

]

Hicks.v. Howmedica osteonics Corp. et al

l3.vl 1 tO DilfJFLN

j'i:.)",": ':..' ..':

'r'; '' ":';r;'
.

i'
-'.! '
Miclain'et'aiv. Howmgitiqa osteoriics corporation l3cu
.
r..t,.;:
..
:
,
t{t i.
i
I
,

l

..

+lrt

ILC
NEW

1

13-01257,

Riley

v-rlewme

,rioa

'

lfll'l ' 't,;: '
DwF/ruN

ILLINOIS CENTRAL
RcuP

i', ,,

:.'

l3cvl9l2

D\^)F/F1N

L

JERSEY

.,NJ

2

r3-0349s

NJ

2

t3_034s6

nwoRKJNv.HoWMEDICAoSTEoNIcs

I3CI\1I3

X,
uORPORATION
LONGACRE v. HOWMEDTCA OSTEONTCS 13 c'ui9
uORPORATION

DUC]FLN

l+

DtrF/FU\)

NEW YORK SOUTHERN

1

13-

0416t Pennings v. Howmedica Osteonics Corporation l3cr,\115 DUFJFLN