Narayan v Citibank, N.A.
Filing
27
ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 1/16/14 ORDERING that Defendant's motion to compel arbitration (ECF No. 21 ) is DENIED as moot; this action is STAYED pending the outcome of the arbitration; All dates and deadlines in this matter are VACATED; and Plaintiff shall notify the court of the conclusion of the arbitration within 10 days thereof. (Becknal, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
PRAKASH NARAYAN,
12
13
14
No.
CIV. S-13-1238 LKK/AC PS
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
CITIBANK, N.A.,
15
Defendant.
16
17
Pending before the court is defendant Citibank’s motion to
18
compel arbitration.
ECF No. 21.
19
plaintiff Parkash Narayan filed a demand for arbitration,
20
requested that defendant’s motion to compel be denied as moot,
21
and requested that this action be stayed pending the outcome of
22
the arbitration.
23
matter should be stayed pending the outcome of the arbitration,
24
and the motion denied as moot.
ECF No. 23.
In response to the motion,
Defendant has now agreed that the
ECF No. 23.
25
Accordingly, the court orders as follows:
26
1.
27
Defendant’s motion to compel arbitration (ECF No. 21)
is DENIED as moot;
28
1
1
2.
2
arbitration;
3
3.
All dates and deadlines in this matter are VACATED; and
4
4.
Plaintiff shall notify the court of the conclusion of
5
This action is STAYED pending the outcome of the
the arbitration within 10 days thereof.
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
DATED:
January 16, 2014.
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?