Turk v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
16
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 2/18/2014 ORDERING the plaintiff's counsel to personally pay to the Clerk of Court $250.00 in monetary sanctions based on his failure to comply with the court's scheduling deadlines and orders; ORDERING the parties to file a Stipulation of Dismissal of action pursuant to F.R.Cv.P. Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) within fourteen (14) days; ALTERNATIVELY ORDERING the Commissioner of Social Security to file an opposition to the 15 Request for Dismissal within fourteen (14) days. (Michel, G)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
RODERICK TURK,
12
13
14
15
16
No. 2:13-cv-1248-KJN
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL
SECURITY,
Defendant.
17
18
For the reasons discussed in its February 14, 2014 order, the court directed plaintiff’s
19
counsel to show cause why he should not be personally sanctioned in the amount of $500 based
20
on his failure to comply with the court’s scheduling deadlines and orders. (ECF No. 12.) That
21
same day, plaintiff filed a response to the order to show cause, a consent to the jurisdiction of a
22
magistrate judge, and a request for dismissal of the action with prejudice. (ECF Nos. 13-15.) In
23
the response to the order to show cause, plaintiff’s counsel indicated that he “makes no excuses
24
for any of his actions and will pay the court’s sanction.” (ECF No. 14.)
25
In light of plaintiff’s counsel’s candor and willingness to accept responsibility for his
26
failures, the court will reduce the amount of monetary sanctions assessed to $250.00. Plaintiff’s
27
counsel is reminded that he can avoid such sanctions in the future by filing timely requests for
28
extension of time. The court is cognizant of the occasional need for extensions of time,
1
1
particularly in high-volume practice areas where multiple briefs may be due at the same time, and
2
more time may be needed to properly evaluate a case and brief the issues. However, the proper
3
way to address such scheduling difficulties is to file a timely request for extension of time before
4
expiration of the applicable deadline.
5
With respect to plaintiff’s request for dismissal of the action with prejudice, because the
6
Commissioner has already filed an answer, the action can only be dismissed pursuant to a
7
stipulation of all parties or by court order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a). It seems unlikely that the
8
Commissioner would oppose dismissal of the action with prejudice. Nevertheless, out of an
9
abundance of caution, the court requires the parties to file a stipulation of dismissal of the action
10
pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) within fourteen (14) days of this
11
order. Alternatively, the Commissioner may file an opposition to the request for dismissal within
12
fourteen (14) days of this order, specifying the grounds for such opposition.
13
In light of the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
14
1. Within fourteen (14) days of this order, plaintiff’s counsel shall personally pay the
15
Clerk of Court $250.00 in monetary sanctions based on his failure to comply with the
16
court’s scheduling deadlines and orders. Plaintiff’s counsel shall not attempt to
17
recover such sanctions from plaintiff, directly or indirectly.
18
2. Within fourteen (14) days of this order, the parties shall file a stipulation of dismissal
19
of the action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii).
20
Alternatively, the Commissioner may file an opposition to the request for dismissal
21
within fourteen (14) days of this order, specifying the grounds for such opposition.
22
23
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 18, 2014
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?