Davies v. Allen et.al.

Filing 28

ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 3/31/2014 ORDERING 25 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS are ADOPTED in full; this action is DISMISSED for failure to exhaust administrative remedies prior to filing suit. CASE CLOSED. (Waggoner, D)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 AVON DAVIES, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:13-cv-1252 KJM CKD P v. ORDER ALLEN, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provide 19 by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On October 7, 2013, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which 20 21 were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings 22 and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed objections to the 23 findings and recommendations. 24 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 25 court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the file, the court 26 finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the proper analysis. 27 ///// 28 ///// 1 1 The court notes plaintiff’s objection that although certain claims were not properly 2 exhausted, his Fourth Amendment claim was exhausted, albeit after filing of the instant suit. This 3 is, however, insufficient to avoid dismissal. See 4 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 5 1. The findings and recommendations filed October 7, 2013 (ECF No. 25), are adopted in 6 full; 7 2. This action is dismissed for failure to exhaust administrative remedies prior to filing 8 suit. 9 DATED: March 31, 2014. 10 11 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?