Iqbal v. United States Citizen and Immigration Services et al
Filing
32
ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 7/2/2014 ORDERING that the matter remain in abeyance pending adjudication of the visa petition by United States Citizenship and Immigration Services; ORDERING the government to file a status report by 9/30/2014. (Michel, G)
5
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
AUDREY B. HEMESATH
Assistant United States Attorney
501 I Street, Suite 10-100
Sacramento, CA 95814
Telephone: (916) 554-2700
Email: Audrey.Hemesath@usdoj.gov
6
Attorneys for Defendants
1
2
3
4
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
NAZIA JABEEN IQBAL,
10
Plaintiff,
11
v.
12
13
14
UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND
IMMIGRATION SERVICES, et. al,
Defendant.
15
)
) Case No.: 2:13-cv-1272-MCE AC
)
) Defendants’ Status Report
)
)
)
)
)
)
16
17
This is an immigration case currently held in abeyance, as United States Citizenship and
18
Immigration Services has reopened the visa petition that is the subject of the complaint. USCIS
19
20
21
is still in the process of adjudicating the reopened visa petition, so the government requests a
further abeyance period, until September 30, 2014.
22
Undersigned counsel has been in contact with the office of opposing counsel, who
23
indicate that they do not oppose this extension, but that they are attempting to withdraw from this
24
25
26
case.
The government will file a status report at the end of this abeyance period.
27
28
1
1
Dated: June 27, 2014
Respectfully submitted,
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
2
3
/s/ Audrey B. Hemesath
AUDREY B. HEMESATH
Assistant U.S. Attorney
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
ORDER
11
The matter remains in abeyance pending adjudication of the visa petition by United
12
13
14
15
16
States Citizenship and Immigration Services. The government is to file a status report by
September 30, 2014.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: July 2, 2014
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?