Iqbal v. United States Citizen and Immigration Services et al
Filing
71
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 7/15/2016 ORDERING that the Motion to Dismiss Hearing is RESET to 12/15/2016 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 7 (MCE) before District Judge Morrison C. England Jr.. (Zignago, K.)
5
PHILLIP A. TALBERT
Acting United States Attorney
AUDREY B. HEMESATH
Assistant United States Attorney
501 I Street, Suite 10-100
Sacramento, CA 95814
Telephone: (916) 554-2700
Email: Audrey.Hemesath@usdoj.gov
6
Attorneys for Defendants
1
2
3
4
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
NAZIA JABEEN IQBAL,
10
Plaintiff,
11
12
13
14
v.
UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND
IMMIGRATION SERVICES, et. al,
Defendant.
15
)
) Case No.: 2:13-cv-1272 MCE AC
)
) Joint Stipulation and Order Continuing
) Hearing Date
)
)
)
)
)
16
17
This is an immigration case currently set for hearing on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss
18
on July 28, 2016. As indicated in a previous filing, a new I-485 application to adjust status has
19
20
21
been filed with United States Citizenship and Immigration Services. An interview in conjunction
with that application has been scheduled for July 27, 2016. In order to accommodate that
22
interview, and the likely adjudication of the application following that interview, the parties
23
request that the hearing be reset to December 15, 2016, at 2 p.m.
24
25
26
27
28
Dated: July 13, 2016
Respectfully submitted,
PHILLIP A. TALBERT
Acting United States Attorney
/s/ Audrey B. Hemesath
AUDREY B. HEMESATH
Assistant U.S. Attorney
1
1
/s/ Michael Wang
MICHAEL WANG
Attorney for Plaintiff
2
3
4
ORDER
5
6
7
8
9
The Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 61) shall be heard on December 15, 2016 at 2pm.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: July 15, 2016
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?