Iqbal v. United States Citizen and Immigration Services et al

Filing 71

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 7/15/2016 ORDERING that the Motion to Dismiss Hearing is RESET to 12/15/2016 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 7 (MCE) before District Judge Morrison C. England Jr.. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
5 PHILLIP A. TALBERT Acting United States Attorney AUDREY B. HEMESATH Assistant United States Attorney 501 I Street, Suite 10-100 Sacramento, CA 95814 Telephone: (916) 554-2700 Email: Audrey.Hemesath@usdoj.gov 6 Attorneys for Defendants 1 2 3 4 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 NAZIA JABEEN IQBAL, 10 Plaintiff, 11 12 13 14 v. UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, et. al, Defendant. 15 ) ) Case No.: 2:13-cv-1272 MCE AC ) ) Joint Stipulation and Order Continuing ) Hearing Date ) ) ) ) ) 16 17 This is an immigration case currently set for hearing on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss 18 on July 28, 2016. As indicated in a previous filing, a new I-485 application to adjust status has 19 20 21 been filed with United States Citizenship and Immigration Services. An interview in conjunction with that application has been scheduled for July 27, 2016. In order to accommodate that 22 interview, and the likely adjudication of the application following that interview, the parties 23 request that the hearing be reset to December 15, 2016, at 2 p.m. 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: July 13, 2016 Respectfully submitted, PHILLIP A. TALBERT Acting United States Attorney /s/ Audrey B. Hemesath AUDREY B. HEMESATH Assistant U.S. Attorney 1 1 /s/ Michael Wang MICHAEL WANG Attorney for Plaintiff 2 3 4 ORDER 5 6 7 8 9 The Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 61) shall be heard on December 15, 2016 at 2pm. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: July 15, 2016 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?