Iqbal v. United States Citizen and Immigration Services et al
Filing
76
ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 1/19/2017 ORDERING that the hearing on defendants' 61 Motion to Dismiss is CONTINUED to 3/23/2017 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 7 (MCE) before District Judge Morrison C. England Jr.. (Zignago, K.)
5
PHILLIP A. TALBERT
United States Attorney
AUDREY B. HEMESATH
Assistant United States Attorney
501 I Street, Suite 10-100
Sacramento, CA 95814
Telephone: (916) 554-2700
Email: Audrey.Hemesath@usdoj.gov
6
Attorneys for Defendants
1
2
3
4
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
NAZIA JABEEN IQBAL,
10
Plaintiff,
11
v.
12
13
14
UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND
IMMIGRATION SERVICES, et. al,
Defendant.
15
)
) Case No.: 2:13-cv-1272 MCE AC
)
) Joint Stipulation and Order Continuing
) Hearing Date
)
)
)
)
)
16
17
This is an immigration case currently set for hearing on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss
18
on January 19, 2017. As indicated in a previous filing, a new I-485 application to adjust status
19
20
21
has been filed with United States Citizenship and Immigration Services. Plaintiff recently
submitted additional information to the agency in response to a Notice of Intent to Deny. In
22
order to allow for agency consideration of that submission and to allow the parties additional
23
time to consult after the adjudication of the application, the parties request that the hearing be
24
25
26
27
28
reset to March 23, 2017, at 2 p.m.
//
//
//
1
1
Dated: January 13, 2017
Respectfully submitted,
PHILLIP A. TALBERT
United States Attorney
2
3
/s/ Audrey B. Hemesath
AUDREY B. HEMESATH
Assistant U.S. Attorney
4
5
6
/s/ Michael Wang
MICHAEL WANG
Attorney for Plaintiff
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
ORDER
Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, the hearing on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss shall
be continued from January 26, 2017 to March 23, 2017 at 2pm.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 19, 2017
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?