Iqbal v. United States Citizen and Immigration Services et al

Filing 76

ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 1/19/2017 ORDERING that the hearing on defendants' 61 Motion to Dismiss is CONTINUED to 3/23/2017 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 7 (MCE) before District Judge Morrison C. England Jr.. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
5 PHILLIP A. TALBERT United States Attorney AUDREY B. HEMESATH Assistant United States Attorney 501 I Street, Suite 10-100 Sacramento, CA 95814 Telephone: (916) 554-2700 Email: Audrey.Hemesath@usdoj.gov 6 Attorneys for Defendants 1 2 3 4 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 NAZIA JABEEN IQBAL, 10 Plaintiff, 11 v. 12 13 14 UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, et. al, Defendant. 15 ) ) Case No.: 2:13-cv-1272 MCE AC ) ) Joint Stipulation and Order Continuing ) Hearing Date ) ) ) ) ) 16 17 This is an immigration case currently set for hearing on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss 18 on January 19, 2017. As indicated in a previous filing, a new I-485 application to adjust status 19 20 21 has been filed with United States Citizenship and Immigration Services. Plaintiff recently submitted additional information to the agency in response to a Notice of Intent to Deny. In 22 order to allow for agency consideration of that submission and to allow the parties additional 23 time to consult after the adjudication of the application, the parties request that the hearing be 24 25 26 27 28 reset to March 23, 2017, at 2 p.m. // // // 1 1 Dated: January 13, 2017 Respectfully submitted, PHILLIP A. TALBERT United States Attorney 2 3 /s/ Audrey B. Hemesath AUDREY B. HEMESATH Assistant U.S. Attorney 4 5 6 /s/ Michael Wang MICHAEL WANG Attorney for Plaintiff 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 ORDER Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, the hearing on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss shall be continued from January 26, 2017 to March 23, 2017 at 2pm. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 19, 2017 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?