Scherffius v. Smith et al
Filing
67
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 11/9/2018 ADOPTING 65 findings and recommendations in full. Plaintiff's 63 motion for continuance of stay is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall notify the court within 120 days about the status of his health and whether the stay should remain in place. (Zignago, K.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MICHAEL E. SCHERFFIUS,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:13-cv-1277 JAM DB P
v.
ORDER
CHRISTOPHER SMITH, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief
18
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
19
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On August 15, 2018, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein
20
21
which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to
22
the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed
23
objections to the findings and recommendations.
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
24
25
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY
26
ORDERED that:
1. The findings and recommendations filed August 15, 2018 are adopted in full.
27
28
////
1
1
2. Plaintiff’s motion for continuance of stay (ECF No. 63) is granted. The stay of these
2
proceedings set out in the court’s February 15, 2018 order is continued and this case remains
3
administratively closed.
4
5
3. Plaintiff shall notify the court within 120 days about the status of his health and
whether the stay should remain in place.
6
7
8
9
DATED: November 9, 2018
/s/ John A. Mendez____________
_____
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?