Scherffius v. Smith et al
Filing
98
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 9/1/2021 ADOPTING 96 The Findings and Recommendations in full; DENYING 92 Motion for relief from judgment. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
Case 2:13-cv-01277-JAM-DB Document 98 Filed 09/01/21 Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MICHAEL E. SCHERFFIUS,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:13-cv-1277 JAM DB P
v.
ORDER
CHRISTOPHER SMITH, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with an action under
17
18
42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28
19
U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On July 9, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which
20
21
were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the
22
findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. (ECF No. 96.) Neither party
23
has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
24
25
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis.
26
////
27
////
28
////
Case 2:13-cv-01277-JAM-DB Document 98 Filed 09/01/21 Page 2 of 2
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. The findings and recommendations filed July 9, 2021 (ECF No. 96), are adopted in
3
4
full; and
2. Plaintiff’s motion for relief from judgment (ECF No. 92) is denied.
5
6
7
8
Dated: September 1, 2021
/s/ John A. Mendez
THE HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?