Scherffius v. Smith et al

Filing 98

ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 9/1/2021 ADOPTING 96 The Findings and Recommendations in full; DENYING 92 Motion for relief from judgment. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
Case 2:13-cv-01277-JAM-DB Document 98 Filed 09/01/21 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MICHAEL E. SCHERFFIUS, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:13-cv-1277 JAM DB P v. ORDER CHRISTOPHER SMITH, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with an action under 17 18 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 19 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On July 9, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 20 21 were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the 22 findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. (ECF No. 96.) Neither party 23 has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 24 25 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. 26 //// 27 //// 28 //// Case 2:13-cv-01277-JAM-DB Document 98 Filed 09/01/21 Page 2 of 2 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed July 9, 2021 (ECF No. 96), are adopted in 3 4 full; and 2. Plaintiff’s motion for relief from judgment (ECF No. 92) is denied. 5 6 7 8 Dated: September 1, 2021 /s/ John A. Mendez THE HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?