Pena et al v. Taylor Farms Pacific, Inc. et al
Filing
313
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 9/27/2019 VACATING the 10/3/2019 status conference pending Plaintiffs filing their notice of renewal for their motion for preliminary settlement approval. (Huang, H)
1
2
3
4
5
JESSE A. CRIPPS, SBN 222285
jcripps@gibsondunn.com
GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
333 South Grand Avenue
Los Angeles, CA 90071-3197
Telephone: 213.229.7000
Facsimile: 213.229.7520
Attorney for Defendant
TAYLOR FARMS PACIFIC, INC.
6
[Additional counsel listed in signature block]
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SACRAMENTO DIVISION
11
12
13
14
MARIA DEL CARMEN PENA, CONSUELO
HERNANDEZ, LETICIA SUAREZ,
ROSEMARY DAIL, and WENDELL T.
MORRIS, on behalf of themselves and on
behalf of all other similarly situated
individuals,
17
18
19
20
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO VACATE
STATUS CONFERENCE
Status Conference Date:
October 3, 2019
Plaintiffs,
15
16
CASE NO. 2:13-cv-01282-KJM-AC
Judge: Honorable Kimberly J. Mueller
v.
TAYLOR FARMS PACIFIC, INC., d/b/a
TAYLOR FARMS, ABEL MENDOZA, INC.,
MANPOWER, INC., QUALITY FARM
LABOR, INC., SLINGSHOT
CONNECTIONS, LLC AND DOES 1-50,
inclusive,
Defendants.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Gibson, Dunn &
Crutcher LLP
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO VACATE STATUS
CONFERENCE –
2:13-CV-01282-KJM-AC
1
The undersigned counsel, on behalf of Plaintiffs and Defendants Taylor Farms Pacific, Inc.
2
(“Taylor Farms Pacific”), Abel Mendoza, Inc., Manpower, Inc., Quality Farm Labor, Inc., and
3
Slingshot Connections, LLC (collectively, the “Parties”), hereby stipulate and agree as follows:
4
WHEREAS:
5
1.
6
7
8
9
On April 5, 2019, Plaintiffs filed a motion for preliminary settlement approval
(“Motion”) in the above-captioned action (Dkt. 287);
2.
After a hearing held on May 31, 2019, the Court denied Plaintiffs’ Motion without
prejudice to renewal in an Order dated August 23, 2019 (Dkt. 305);
3.
As stated in the Court’s Order, Plaintiffs may renew their Motion to “adequately address
10
the court’s remaining concerns described” in the Order, and Plaintiffs “may do so by filing a notice of
11
renewal and reliance on prior briefing, with supplemental briefing focusing on only the issues called
12
out by” the Order (Dkt. 305 at 9);
13
4.
On September 4, 2019, the Court set a status conference for October 3, 2019 (Dkt. 306);
14
5.
In light of the August 23, 2019 Order, Plaintiffs intend to file a notice of renewal for
15
their motion for preliminary approval to adequately address the Court’s remaining concerns by no later
16
than October 11, 2019. Accordingly, the Parties believe that a status conference would be unnecessary
17
at this time.
18
THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the Parties, through their
19
respective counsel, that, subject to this Court’s approval, the current October 3, 2019 status conference
20
be vacated pending Plaintiffs filing their notice of renewal for their motion for preliminary settlement
21
approval.
22
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Gibson, Dunn &
Crutcher LLP
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO VACATE STATUS
CONFERENCE –
2:13-CV-01282-KJM-AC
1
2
Dated: September 26, 2019
Respecfully submitted,
PARRIS LAW FIRM
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
By: /s/ John M. Bickford (as authorized on 9/25/19)
R. Rex Parris (SBN 96567)
rrparris@parrislawyers.com
Kitty K. Szeto (SBN 258136)
kszeto@parrislawyers.com
John M. Bickford (SBN 280929)
jbickford@parrislawyers.com
Eric N. Wilson (SBN 291815)
ewilson@parrislawyers.com
PARRIS LAW FIRM
43364 10th Street West
Lancaster, CA 93534
Tel: 661.949.2595 | Fax: 661.949.7524
Attorney for Plaintiffs
MARIA DEL CARMEN PENA, CONSUELO
HERNANDEZ, LETICIA SUAREZ, ROSEMARY DAIL,
and WENDELL T. MORRIS
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
By: /s/ Jesse A. Cripps
Jesse A. Cripps
jcripps@gibsondunn.com
GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
333 South Grand Avenue
Los Angeles, CA 90071-3197
Tel: 213.229.7000 | Fax: 213.229.7520
Attorney for Defendant
TAYLOR FARMS PACIFIC, INC.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Gibson, Dunn &
Crutcher LLP
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO VACATE STATUS
CONFERENCE –
2:13-CV-01282-KJM-AC
1
MCCORMICK BARSTOW LLP
2
3
4
5
6
7
By: /s/ Wade M. Hansard (as authorized on 9/26/19)
Wade M. Hansard (SBN 76676)
wade.hansard@mccormickbarstow.com
Christina C. Tillman (SBN 258627)
christina.tillman@mccormickbarstow.com
Laura A. Wolfe (SBN 266751)
laura.wolfe@mccormickbarstow.com
MCCORMICK BARSTOW LLP
7647 N. Fresno Street
Fresno, CA 93720
Tel: 559.433.1300 | Fax: 559.433.2300
8
9
Attorneys for Defendant
ABEL MENDOZA, INC.
10
LITTLER MENDELSON P.C.
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
By: /s/ Gregory G. Iskander (as authorized on 9/26/19)
Gregory G. Iskander (SBN 200215)
giskander@littler.com
LITTLER MENDELSON P.C.
1255 Treat Boulevard, Suite 600
Walnut Creek, CA 94597
Tel: 925.932.2468 | Fax: 925.946.9809
Attorneys for Defendants
MANPOWER, INC./CALIFORNIA PENINSULA,
erroneously sued as MANPOWER, INC.
18
NOLAND, HAMERLY, ETIENNE & HOSS
19
20
21
22
23
By: /s/ Terrence R. O’Connor (as authorized on 9/26/19)
Terrence R. O'Connor (SBN 88004)
toconnor@nheh.com
NOLAND, HAMERLY, ETIENNE & HOSS
333 Salinas Street
P.O. Box 2510
Salinas, CA 93902-2510
Tel: 831.424.1414 | Fax: 831.424.1975
24
25
Attorneys for Defendant
QUALITY FARM LABOR, INC.
26
27
28
4
Gibson, Dunn &
Crutcher LLP
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO VACATE STATUS
CONFERENCE –
2:13-CV-01282-KJM-AC
VENTURA ROSSI HERSEY & MULLER, LLP
1
2
By: /s/ Daniel J. Muller (as authorized on 9/26/19)
Daniel J. Muller (SBN 193396)
dmuller@venturarossi.com
VENTURA ROSSI HERSEY & MULLER, LLP
160 W. Santa Clara Street, Suite 1575
San Jose, CA 95113
Tel: 408.512.3025 | Fax: 408.512.3022
3
4
5
6
Attorneys for Defendant
SLINGSHOT CONNECTIONS, LLC
7
8
9
10
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: September 27, 2019.
11
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
5
Gibson, Dunn &
Crutcher LLP
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO VACATE STATUS
CONFERENCE –
2:13-CV-01282-KJM-AC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?