Burch v. California Department of Motor Vehicles
Filing
60
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 2/3/2015. This matter is REFERRED BACK to District Judge Troy L. Nunley pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). All dates pending before Magistrate Judge Drozd are VACATED. Henceforth cation on documents filed in action shall be 2:13CV-1283 TLN DAD with "PS" designation being eliminated. (Marciel, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
BRIAN BURCH,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
No. 2:13-cv-1283 TLN DAD PS
v.
ORDER
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
MOTOR VEHICLES,
16
Defendant.
17
18
On November 6, 2014, the assigned District Judge referred this matter to the undersigned
19
pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21) because plaintiff was proceeding pro se at that time. (Dkt. No.
20
47.) On February 2, 2015, however, the assigned District Judge approved the request of attorney
21
Gregory M. Finch to substitute in to this action as counsel of record for the plaintiff. (Dkt. No.
22
59.)
Because the plaintiff is no longer proceeding pro se, Local Rule 302(c)(21) no longer
23
24
applies and, accordingly, the case will be referred back to the assigned District Judge. Therefore,
25
all pretrial motions, other than discovery motions, should now be noticed for hearing before the
26
District Judge assigned to this action. The assigned Magistrate Judge shall continue to perform
27
all duties described in Local Rule 302(c)(1)-(20).
28
/////
1
1
2
3
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. This matter is referred back to the District Judge assigned to this action
pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21);
4
2. All dates pending before the undersigned are vacated; and
5
3. Henceforth the caption on documents filed in this action shall be
6
7
8
No. 2:13-cv-1283 TLN DAD with the “PS” designation being eliminated.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 3, 2015
9
10
11
12
13
DAD:6
Ddad1\orders.pro se\burch1283.refer.back.docx
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?