Burch v. California Department of Motor Vehicles

Filing 68

STIPULATION and ORDER for mental testing and examination pursuant to Rule 35 of the FRCP signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 12/4/2015. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 KAMALA D. HARRIS, State Bar No. 146672 Attorney General of California DAVID J. NEILL, State Bar No. 186997 Supervising Deputy Attorney General LYKISHA D. BEASLEY, State Bar No. 282907 Deputy Attorney General 1300 I Street, Suite 125 P.O. Box 944255 Sacramento, CA 94244-2550 Telephone: (916) 324-3646 Fax: (916) 324-5567 E-mail: Lykisha.Beasley@doj.ca.gov Attorneys for Defendant Department of Motor Vehicles 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 BRIAN BURCH, 14 15 v. 16 17 2:13-CV-01283-TLN-DAD Plaintiff, STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR MENTAL TESTING AND EXAMINATION PURSUANT TO RULE 35 OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES and DOES 1 - 10, inclusive, Judge: Honorable Troy L. Nunley Trial Date: July 11, 2016 Action Filed: June 26, 2013 18 Defendant. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 It is stipulated by Gregory Finch of the Signature Law Group, attorneys for plaintiff, and by Lykisha D. Beasley, Deputy Attorney General of the California Attorney General’s Office, attorneys for defendants (collectively, the “parties”) as follows: 1. The vocational abilities and earning capacity of the plaintiff are in controversy in the above-referenced action. Plaintiff alleges that actions taken by his employer, the DMV, have and will continue to cause him to incur significant lost income, lost benefits, and lost employment and promotional opportunities. Plaintiff also claims that at times, he was given inordinate amounts of work, insufficient amounts of work, inaccurate work evaluations, and also that he was subject to a 28 1 Stipulation and Order for Mental Testing and Examination (2:13-CV-01283-TLN-DAD) 1 hostile work environment. Plaintiff further asserts that he suffers from depression, anxiety, stress, 2 and humiliation due to the defendant employer. Between July of 2011 and January of 2015, 3 plaintiff has worked only a handful of days due to medical in connection with the allegations at 4 issue in this lawsuit. 5 2. Plaintiff will thus submit to a vocational interview and testing administered by Ricky 6 A. Sarkisian, Ph.D. The testing shall be conducted to industry standards. The interview and 7 testing will take place at Valley Rehabilitation Services, Inc., 545 E. Alluvial Avenue, Suite 116, 8 Fresno, CA 93720. The interview and testing by Dr. Sarkisian will occur on November 23, 2015. 9 The interview and testing will begin at 10:00 a.m. and last approximately four hours, and will be 10 conducted in an air conditioned office-type setting. Only plaintiff and Dr. Sarkisian (and Dr. 11 Sarkisian’s support staff, if any) are permitted inside the room where the interview and testing 12 will take place. 13 3. Plaintiff will also submit to a clinical interview and psychological testing conducted 14 by Randall Epperson, Ph.D, on February 16, 2016, at 9:00 a.m. The examination will take place at 15 Dr. Epperson’s office located at 1601 I Street, Suite 440, Modesto, CA 95354. The examination 16 will begin at 9:00 a.m. and last approximately seven hours, and will be conducted in an air 17 conditioned office-type setting. Only plaintiff and Dr. Epperson (and Dr. Epperson’s support 18 staff, if any) are permitted inside the room where the examination will take place. The parties 19 understand and agree that the Scheduling Order (ECF No. 65) will need to be modified in order to 20 accommodate the psychological examination appointment which falls beyond the close of 21 discovery. The parties stipulate to holding discovery open until February 16, 2016 for the sole 22 purpose of Dr. Epperson’s examination. All other discovery will be completed by November 25, 23 2015 in accordance with the Scheduling Order. 24 4. During the testing and interview, plaintiff shall truthfully answer all questions 25 submitted to him by Drs. Sarkisian and Epperson including those concerning his occupational 26 history, his prior and current injuries, and his prior and current medical and psychological 27 condition as well as those items listed below in paragraph 5. 28 2 Stipulation and Order for Mental Testing and Examination (2:13-CV-01283-TLN-DAD) 1 5. The testing and interview will involve no invasive, dangerous, or painful physical 2 procedures. The interview portion will involve taking plaintiff’s medical and psychiatric history, 3 including a personal, family, marital, relationship, developmental, educational, financial, 4 occupational, social, legal, drug, alcohol, medical, medication, and hospitalization history. The 5 examination will involve a mental status interview.. The interview will also involve taking a 6 stated history of events leading to the emotional, mental or medical conditions plaintiff claims to 7 have suffered as a result of defendants’ alleged conduct, identified above; the appropriateness of 8 treatment plaintiff received including therapy, counseling, and medication; an evaluation of the 9 prognosis of the plaintiff’s conditions; and, an evaluation as to whether plaintiff would benefit 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 from a particular course of treatment. 6. This stipulation is made in lieu of the defendants’ motion pursuant to Rule 35 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 7. Defendants are responsible for Drs. Sarkisian and Epperson’s costs conducting the testing and examination. IT IS SO STIPULATED. Dated: November 20, 2015 17 GREGORY.FINCH, ESQ. SIGNATURE LAW GROUP, LLP. /s/ GREGORY FINCH as authorized on 11/20/15 18 19 GREGORY FINCH Attorneys for Plaintiff 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: November 20, 2015 KAMALA D. HARRIS ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CALIFORNIA DAVID J. NEILL SUPERVISING DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL /s/ LYKISHA D. BEASLEY LYKISHA D. BEASLEY DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL Attorneys for Defendants 3 Stipulation and Order for Mental Testing and Examination (2:13-CV-01283-TLN-DAD) 1 2 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 4, 2015 4 5 6 7 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 Stipulation and Order for Mental Testing and Examination (2:13-CV-01283-TLN-DAD)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?