Hedrick v. District Attorney Office et al

Filing 9

FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 6/10/2014 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Zignago, K.)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

VICTOR HEDRICK,

12
13
14

No. 2:13-cv-1292 KJM AC PS

Plaintiff,
v.

FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
17

Plaintiff’s first amended complaint was dismissed on November 1, 2013 and thirty days

18

leave to file a second amended complaint was granted. Thirty days from that date have now

19

passed, and plaintiff has not filed a second amended complaint, or otherwise responded to the

20

court’s order.

21
22

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without
prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

23

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

24

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days

25

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

26

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned

27

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any reply to the objections

28

shall be served and filed within fourteen days after service of the objections. The parties are
1

1

advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the

2

District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

3

DATED: June 10, 2014

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2