Banks, III v. Colvin
Filing
12
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 12/5/13 re: 11 ORDERING a first extension of time for Plaintiff of 60 days up through and including 2/5/14, in which to e-file his Motion for Summary Judgment; and Defendant shall file any oppostion, including cross-motions, on or before 3/7/14. (Meuleman, A)
1
HARVEY P. SACKETT (72488)
2
3
4
5
1055 Lincoln Avenue
Post Office Box 5025
San Jose, California 95150-5025
Telephone: (408) 295-7755
Facsimile: (408) 295-7444
6
7
Attorney for Plaintiff
8
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
SACRAMENTO DIVISION
13
14
15
BEN BANKS, III,
16
17
Plaintiff,
v.
18
19
20
CAROLYN W. COLVIN,
Acting Commissioner,
Social Security Administration,
Defendant.
21
22
23
) Case No: 2:13-cv-01331-DAD
)
)
)
) STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff and Defendant, through their respective attorneys, hereby stipulate that: (1)
24
Plaintiff shall have a first extension of time of (60) days up through and including Wednesday,
25
February 5, 2014 in which to e-file his Motion for Summary Judgment; and (2) Defendant shall
26
file any opposition, including cross-motions, on or before March 7, 2014. This extension is
27
/////
28
1
necessitated by the number of cases (8) the firm presently has pending before this and other
2
district courts that require briefing.
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
3
4
Authorization granted by
Lorna Li, Supervisory Attorney
5
6
Dated: December 5, 2013
/s/JEFFREY CHEN
JEFFREY CHEN
Special Assistant U.S. Attorney
Social Security Administration
Dated: December 5, 2013
/s/HARVEY P. SACKETT
HARVEY P. SACKETT
Attorney for Plaintiff
BEN BANKS, III
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
ORDER
15
16
17
Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: December 5, 2013
18
19
20
21
Ddad1\orders.soc sec\banks1331.stip.eot.ord.doc
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?