Banks, III v. Colvin

Filing 12

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 12/5/13 re: 11 ORDERING a first extension of time for Plaintiff of 60 days up through and including 2/5/14, in which to e-file his Motion for Summary Judgment; and Defendant shall file any oppostion, including cross-motions, on or before 3/7/14. (Meuleman, A)

Download PDF
1 HARVEY P. SACKETT (72488) 2 3 4 5 1055 Lincoln Avenue Post Office Box 5025 San Jose, California 95150-5025 Telephone: (408) 295-7755 Facsimile: (408) 295-7444 6 7 Attorney for Plaintiff 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 SACRAMENTO DIVISION 13 14 15 BEN BANKS, III, 16 17 Plaintiff, v. 18 19 20 CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Defendant. 21 22 23 ) Case No: 2:13-cv-01331-DAD ) ) ) ) STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff and Defendant, through their respective attorneys, hereby stipulate that: (1) 24 Plaintiff shall have a first extension of time of (60) days up through and including Wednesday, 25 February 5, 2014 in which to e-file his Motion for Summary Judgment; and (2) Defendant shall 26 file any opposition, including cross-motions, on or before March 7, 2014. This extension is 27 ///// 28 1 necessitated by the number of cases (8) the firm presently has pending before this and other 2 district courts that require briefing. BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney 3 4 Authorization granted by Lorna Li, Supervisory Attorney 5 6 Dated: December 5, 2013 /s/JEFFREY CHEN JEFFREY CHEN Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Social Security Administration Dated: December 5, 2013 /s/HARVEY P. SACKETT HARVEY P. SACKETT Attorney for Plaintiff BEN BANKS, III 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 ORDER 15 16 17 Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 5, 2013 18 19 20 21 Ddad1\orders.soc sec\banks1331.stip.eot.ord.doc 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?