Rose, et al v. County of Sacramento, et al
Filing
124
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 9/14/17 GRANTING 119 the Foundation of Exhibits.(Becknal, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
LONGYEAR, O’DEA & LAVRA, LLP
Van Longyear, CSB No. 84189
Peter C. Zilaff, CSB No. 272658
3620 American River Drive, Suite 230
Sacramento, CA 95864
Phone: (916) 974-8500
Facsimile: (916) 974-8510
Attorneys for Defendants COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO,
SHERIFF SCOTT JONES, AND DEPUTY DAVID McENTIRE
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Estate of JOHNATHAN ROSE, deceased, by
and through his parents THEODORE
MILTON ROSE and KAREN ROSE, as
successors in interest; THEODORE MILTON
ROSE, Individually; and KAREN ROSE,
Individually,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
vs.
)
)
COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO; Sacramento )
County Sheriff SCOTT JONES; Sacramento )
County Sheriff’s Department Deputy DAVID )
McENTIRE (Badge #1356); and DOES 1
)
through 10, inclusive,
)
)
Defendants.
)
Case No. 2:13-cv-01339 TLN EFB
STIPULATION REGARDING THE
FOUNDATION OF EXHIBITS AND
ORDER
Trial Date: September 18, 2017
Time: 9:00 a.m.
Ctrm: 2
Judge: Hon. Troy L. Nunley
19
Plaintiffs, Estate of Johnathan Rose, by and through his parents Theodore Milton Rose
20
21
and Karen Rose, as successors in interest, Theodore Milton Rose, individually, and Karen Rose,
22
individually, are represented by Stewart Katz of the Law Office of Stewart Katz, Moseley C.
23
Collins, III of the Law Office of Moseley C. Collins, III and Dale K Galipo of the Law Office of
24
Dale K. Galipo. Defendants County of Sacramento and David McEntire (“Defendants”) are
25
represented by Van Longyear and Peter Zilaff of Longyear, O’Dea & Lavra, LLP.
26
///
27
///
28
///
-1
For the purposes of reducing trial testimony, the parties through their respective attorneys
1
2
stipulate to the foundation, although not the admissibility, of the following documents. The
3
parties reserve all other objections to the evidence.
1.
4
Each of the photographs included in the parties’ trial exhibits lists depicting and
5
described as the Plaintiffs’ house exterior, interior and surrounding street, marked by bates
6
stamps CO_000306-CO000891, were taken by Sacramento Sheriff’s Department Crime Scene
7
Investigators on the night of January 17 and morning of January 18, 2012 and accurately depict
8
the scene inside and surrounding the Plaintiffs’ house as it appeared at that time.
2.
9
The videos included in Defendants’ trial exhibit list depicting and described as the
10
Rose home interior and exterior, marked by bates stamps CO_001037-CO_001038, were
11
recorded by Sacramento Sheriff’s Department Crime Scene Investigators on the night of January
12
17 and morning of January 18, 2012 and accurately depict the scene inside and surrounding the
13
Plaintiffs’ house as it appeared at that time.
3.
14
Each of the photographs included in the parties’ trial exhibits lists depicting and
15
described as the photographs of Deputy David McEntire, marked by bates stamps CO_000279 –
16
CO_000305, were taken by Sacramento Sheriff’s Department Crime Scene Investigators the
17
night of January 17, 2012 and accurately depict Deputy McEntire as he appeared at that time.
4.
18
Each of the photographs included in the parties’ trial exhibits lists depicting and
19
described as the photographs of Deputy David McEntire, marked by bates stamps CO_000715 –
20
CO_000748, were taken by Sacramento Sheriff’s Department Crime Scene Investigators the
21
early morning of January 18, 2012 and accurately depict Deputy McEntire as he appeared at that
22
time.
5.
23
Each of the photographs included in the parties’ trial exhibits lists depicting and
24
described as the photographs of Deputy David McEntire, marked by bates stamps CO_000940-
25
000971 and CO_001000 – CO_001031, were taken by Sacramento Sheriff’s Department Crime
26
Scene Investigators on January 19, 2012 and accurately depict Deputy McEntire as he appeared
27
at that time.
28
///
-2
1
6.
Each of the photographs included in the parties’ trial exhibits lists depicting and
2
described as the photographs of Johnathan Rose in the Mercy San Juan Hospital operating room,
3
marked by bates stamps CO_000972-000987, were taken by Sacramento Sheriff’s Department
4
Crime Scene Investigators on January 17, 2012 and accurately depict Johnathan Rose as he
5
appeared at that time.
6
7.
Each of the photographs included in the parties’ trial exhibits lists depicting and
7
described as the photographs of Johnathan Rose during his autopsy by the Sacramento County
8
Department of Coroner, marked by bates stamps CO_001059-001140, were taken on January 19,
9
2012 and accurately depict Johnathan Rose as he appeared at that time.
10
11
12
8.
The photographs, listed as Plaintiffs’ exhibits numbers 73 – 78, are photographs
of Johnathan Rose that accurately depict him at the time taken.
9.
Each of the photographs included in the parties’ trial exhibits lists depicting and
13
described as the photographs of Deputy David McEntire’s duty belt and contents, marked by
14
bates stamps CO_000892-CO_000939 and CO_000988-000999, were taken on January 18 and
15
19, 2012 and accurately depict the duty belt and contents as they appeared at that time.
16
10.
The exhibit, identified by parties with bates stamps CO_000096-97, is a diagram
17
and corresponding legend prepared by Sacramento Sheriff’s Department Crime Scene
18
Investigators and depicts the living and dining area of the Plaintiffs’ house on the night of
19
January 17, 2012. The parties agree that the diagram is not to scale.
20
11.
The exhibit, identified by bates stamp CO_001036, is an accurate copy of the
21
recorded portion of the interview by Sacramento Sheriffs’ Department Detective Robert Tracy of
22
the Plaintiffs Theodore Milton Rose and Karen Rose, and their adult children Theodore and
23
Tiffany Rose, recorded in the early morning hours of January 18, 2012.
24
12.
The exhibit, identified by bates stamp CO_001141, is an accurate recording of
25
Plaintiff Theodore Milton Rose’s telephone call with 911 dispatchers on the night of January 17,
26
2012. The exhibits, listed by Defendants as Exhibits “Q1” and “Q2,” are audio enhanced copies
27
of Plaintiff Theodore Milton Rose’s telephone call with 911 dispatchers on the night of January
28
17, 2012.
-3
1
13.
The exhibits, identified by bates stamps CO_001033 and CO_001034 (video and
2
audio, respectively), are accurate recordings of the statement by Deputy David McEntire
3
provided to Sacramento Sheriff’s Department Detective Brian Meux in the early morning of
4
January 18, 2012.
5
6
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED:
7
8
Dated: September 13, 2017
LONGYEAR, O’DEA & LAVRA, LLP
9
By: _/s/ Peter C. Zilaff
.
VAN LONGYEAR
PETER C. ZILAFF
Attorneys for Defendants, COUNTY OF
SACRAMENTO, SHERIFF SCOTT
JONES, AND DEPUTY DAVID
McENTIRE
10
11
12
13
14
15
Dated: September 13, 2017
LAW OFFICES OF STEWART KATZ
16
17
18
By: /s/ Stewart Katz
STEWART KATZ
DALE K. GALIPO
MELANIE T. PARTOW
MOSELEY C. COLLINS, III
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
19
20
21
22
23
IT IS SO ORDERED:
24
25
Dated: September 14, 2017
26
27
28
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
-4
.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?