Carolina Casualty Insurance Company v. Oahu Air Conditioning Service, Inc. et al

Filing 146

ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 5/29/2015 GRANTING 140 Ex Parte Application for modification of the 3/18/2015 Order Modifying Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Order. The Court Orders that the 3/18/2015, Order Modifying Status (Pretri al Scheduling) Order is MODIFIED as follows: The parties are required to disclose experts and produce reports by no later than 3/2/2016, and with regard to expert testimony intended solely for rebuttal on or before 4/10/2016. All discovery includin g depositions for preservation of testimony is to be completed by 4/30/2016, and all discovery motions heard (and any resulting orders obeyed) not later than 4/30/2016. All motions, except motions for continuances, temporary restraining orders, or other emergency applications, are to be filed on or before 6/3/2016. The Final Pretrial Conference is set for 8/15/2016 at 2:00 p.m.. The Jury Trial is set for 10/12/2016 at 9:00 a.m., with an estimated ten day trial. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NOEL EDLIN, ESQ. (SBN 107796) nedlin@behblaw.com FARHEENA A. HABIB, ESQ. (SBN 243405) fhabib@behblaw.com BASSI, EDLIN, HUIE & BLUM LLP 500 Washington Street, Suite 700 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 397-9006 Facsimile: (415) 397-1339 Attorneys for Defendant OAHU AIR CONDITIONING SERVICE, INC. 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 CAROLINA CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) ) OAHU AIR CONDITIONING SERVICE, ) INC. dba OAHU AIR CONDITIONING CO., ) PACIFIC COMMERICAL SERVICES, LLC., ) MATSON NAVIGATION COMPANY, INC., ) and DOES 1 through 100, ) ) Defendants. ) ) OAHU AIR CONDITIONING SERVICE, ) INC. ) ) Third-Party Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) CLEAN HARBORS ENVIRONMENTAL ) SERVICES, INC., SMITH SYSTEMS ) TRANSPORTATION, INC., KAISER ) PERMANENTE VENTURES, LLC, ) GOOGLE, INC., FOOTHILL-DE ANZA ) COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT, TEST ) AMERICA LABORATORIES, INC., & ) NEKTAR THERAPEUTICS ) ) Third-Party Defendants. ) ) ) Case No. 2:13-cv-01378-WBS-AC ORDER GRANTING OAHU AIR CONDITIONING SERVICE INC.’S EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER MODIFYING THE MARCH 18, 2015, STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER, AND FOR CONTINUANCE OF THE TRIAL DATE AND ALL OTHER DEADLINES 28 1305189 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING OAHU AIR CONDITIONING SERVICE, INC.’S EX PARTE APPLICATION 1 There being no opposition, and all parties having agreed to the ex parte application of 2 Oahu Air Conditioning Service, Inc. for modification of the March 18, 2015, Order Modifying 3 Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Order and continuance of the trial date and all other deadlines having 4 been submitted to the Court and served upon the parties, and UPON GOOD CAUSE 5 SHOWING, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED as follows: 6 7 The Court Orders that the March 18, 2015, Order Modifying Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Order is modified as follows: 8 1. The parties are required to disclose experts and produce reports in accordance 9 with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2) by no later than March 2, 2016, and 10 with regard to expert testimony intended solely for rebuttal on or before April 10, 11 2016. 12 2. All discovery including depositions for preservation of testimony is to be 13 completed by April 30, 2016, and all discovery motions heard (and any resulting 14 orders obeyed) not later than April 30, 2016. 15 3. 16 All motions, except motions for continuances, temporary restraining orders, or other emergency applications, are to be filed on or before June 3, 2016. 17 4. The Final Pretrial Conference is set for August 15, 2016 at 2:00 p.m. 18 5. The Jury Trial is set for October 12, 2016 at 9:00 a.m., with an estimated ten day 19 20 trial. Dated: May 29, 2015 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1305189 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING OAHU AIR CONDITIONING SERVICE, INC.’S EX PARTE APPLICATION

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?