Jones v. Brazelton

Filing 46

ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 10/15/2015 ORDERING that the 43 Findings and Recommendations are ADOPTED IN FULL. Petitioner's 36 Motion for Relief from Judgment is DENIED. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CLIFTON JONES, 12 Petitioner, 13 14 No. 2:13-cv-1379 JAM KJN P v. ORDER MARION SPEARMAN, 15 Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas 17 18 corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 19 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On July 28, 2015, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 20 21 were served on petitioner and which contained notice to petitioner that any objections to the 22 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. On August 20, 2015, 23 petitioner was granted an extension of time until September 3, 2015 to file objections. Petitioner 24 has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 25 26 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 27 ORDERED that: 28 //// 1 1 2 3 4 1. The findings and recommendations filed July 28, 2015 (ECF No. 43) are adopted in full. 2. Petitioner’s motion for relief from judgment (ECF No. 36) is denied. DATED: October 15, 2015 5 /s/ John A. Mendez_______________________ 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?