Flippin v. City of Vallejo et al
Filing
10
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 8/22/2014 DISMISSING this action without prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Yin, K)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ROBIN A. FLIPPIN,
12
13
14
No. 2:13-cv-1381 KJN P
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
CITY OF VALLEJO, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff consented to proceed before the undersigned for all purposes. See 28 U.S.C.
18
§ 636(c). By order filed June 4, 2014, plaintiff was ordered to show cause, within twenty-one
19
days, why this action should not be dismissed. The twenty-one day period has now expired, and
20
plaintiff has not shown cause or otherwise responded to the court’s order.
21
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice.
22
See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
23
Dated: August 22, 2014
24
25
/flip1381.fsc
26
27
28
1
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
