JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. v. Sierra Pacific Mortgage Company, Inc.

Filing 112

STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 2/4/2016 AMENDING 106 Order; ORDERING that discovery be completed by 3/1/2016. (Michel, G.)

1 Jonathan M. Jenkins (State Bar No. 193011)

[e-mail]

2 Lara T. Kayayan (State Bar No. 239384)

[e-mail]

3 Tuyet Tran (State Bar No. 245699)

[e-mail]

4 Navdeep Singh (State Bar No. 284486)

[e-mail]

5 JENKINS KAYAYAN LLP

444 S. Flower Street, Suite 1750

6 Los Angeles, California 90071

Telephone: [phone]

7 Fax: [phone]

Counsel for Defendant

8 SIERRA PACIFIC MORTGAGE
9

COMPANY, INC.

Philip A. McLeod (State Bar No. 101101)

10 Nathan Jaskowiak (State Bar No. 248007)

KEESAL, YOUNG & LOGAN

11 450 Pacific Avenue

San Francisco, California 94133

12 Telephone: [phone]

Facsimile: [phone]

13 -and-

Gregory M. Sudbury

14 Admitted Pro Hac

Kodie P. Bennion

15 Admitted Pro Hac

QUILLING, SELANDER, LOWNDS,

16 WINSLETT & MOSER, P.C.

2001 Bryan Street, Suite 1800

17 Dallas, Texas 75201

Telephone: [phone]

18 Facsimile: [phone]

Attorneys for Plaintiff

19 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
20
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

21
22
23

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.,

24
25
26
27

Plaintiff,

No. 2:13-CV-01397-JAM-KJN
The Hon. John Mendez
Robert T. Matsui Courthouse

v.
SIERRA PACIFIC MORTGAGE
COMPANY, INC.,

AMENDED ORDER GRANTING
STIPULATION FOR BRIEF EXTENSION
OF DEADLINE TO CONCLUDE
DISCOVERY

28
1
AMENDED PROPOSED ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION– CASE NO. 2:13-CV-01397-JAM-KJN

1
Defendant.
2
3
4
5

After consideration of the Parties’ Stipulation to Extend the Deadline to Conclude
Discovery, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:

6

The discovery deadline contained in the Order Granting Amended Stipulation to Extend

7

the Discovery and Dispositive Motions Deadline (Dkt. No. 106) is extended until March 1, 2016;

8

and all discovery shall be completed by March 1, 2016. In this context, “completed” means that

9

discovery shall have been conducted so that all depositions have been taken and any disputes

10

relative to discovery shall have been resolved by appropriate order if necessary and, where

11

discovery has been ordered, the order has been complied with.

12
13

IT IS SO ORDERED.

14
15
16

DATED: February 4, 2016
/s/ John A. Mendez____________
United States District Court Judge

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
AMENDED PROPOSED ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION– CASE NO. 2:13-CV-01397-JAM-KJN