JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. v. Sierra Pacific Mortgage Company, Inc.

Filing 151

ORDER DISMISSING CASE with Prejudice, signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 5/6/16. CASE CLOSED (Kastilahn, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

PHILIP A. MCLEOD, CASB 101101
NATHAN JASKOWIAK, CASB 248007
KEESAL, YOUNG & LOGAN
450 Pacific Avenue
San Francisco, California 94133
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
-andGREGORY M. SUDBURY
Admitted Pro Hac
KODIE P. BENNION
Admitted Pro Hac
QUILLING, SELANDER, LOWNDS,
WINSLETT & MOSER, P.C.
2001 Bryan Street, Suite 1800
Dallas, Texas 75201
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.

11
12
13
14
15
16

JONATHAN M. JENKINS, CASB 193011
LARA T. KAYAYAN, CASB 239384
JENKINS KAYAYAN LLP
444 S. Flower Street, Suite 1750
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: (310-984-6840
ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT
SIERRA PACIFIC MORTGAGE COMPANY

17

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

18
19
20

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.,
Plaintiff,

21
22

No.

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE

v.

23

SIERRA PACIFIC MORTGAGE
COMPANY, INC.,

24

2:13-CV-01397-JAM-KJN

Defendant.

25
26
27
28

- 1 -

1

The Court, having considered Plaintiff JPMorgan Chase Bank,

2

N.A. (JPMC or Plaintiff) and Defendant Sierra Pacific Mortgage

3

Company,

Inc.’s

(Sierra

or

Defendant)

Joint

Stipulation

of

4
Dismissal with Prejudice, hereby grants same.
5
It is therefore ORDERED that all claims which were asserted
6
7

between Plaintiff and Defendant related to the Loans identified

8

as 1 through 4, 6, 7, and 9 through 14 in Exhibit B to the

9

Complaint (Dkt No. 1) in this civil action are hereby dismissed

10

with prejudice.

11

18 in Exhibit B to the Complaint were previously dismissed with

12

Because the Loans identified as 5, 8, 15, 16 and

prejudice and the Loan identified as 17 in Exhibit B of the

13
Complaint was previously dismissed without prejudice (Dkt No.
14
15
16

77), this stipulation dismisses all remaining claims pending in
this civil action.

17

All relief not granted herein is denied, such that this

18

Order of Dismissal with Prejudice fully resolves all claims by

19

the parties in this civil action and constitutes final judgment.

20

SO ORDERED.

21
SIGNED this the 6th day of May, 2016.
22
23

/s/ John A. Mendez
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

24
25

4813-2693-6369, v.

2

26
27
28

2