JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. v. Sierra Pacific Mortgage Company, Inc.

Filing 69

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 7/30/15. The hearing scheduled for August 20, 2015 on Plaintiff's Motion to Quash Defendants Subpoenas is vacated. Defendant shall not attempt to enforce the non-party subpoenas to J PMorgan Chase & Co., "JPMorgan Mortgage Acceptance Corporation" and JPMorgan Securities, LLC or address the objections to those subpoenas until after a ruling is entered on Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend the Complaint. (Kaminski, H)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

PHILIP A. MCLEOD, CASB 101101
NATHAN JASKOWIAK, CASB 248007
KEESAL, YOUNG & LOGAN
450 Pacific Avenue
San Francisco, California 94133
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
-andGREGORY M. SUDBURY
Admitted Pro Hac
KODIE P. BENNION
Admitted Pro Hac
QUILLING, SELANDER, LOWNDS,
WINSLETT & MOSER, P.C.
2001 Bryan Street, Suite 1800
Dallas, Texas 75201
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.

11
12
13
14
15
16

JONATHAN M. JENKINS, CASB 193011
LARA T. KAYAYAN, CASB 239384
JENKINS KAYAYAN LLP
444 S. Flower Street, Suite 1530
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: (310-984-6840
ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT
SIERRA PACIFIC MORTGAGE COMPANY, INC.

17

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

18
19
20

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.,
Plaintiff,

21
22
23
24
25
26

No. 2:13-CV-01397-JAM-KJN
The Hon. Kendall J. Newman
Robert T. Matsui Courthouse

v.
SIERRA PACIFIC MORTGAGE
COMPANY, INC.,
Defendant.

PROPOSED ORDER GRANTING
STIPULATION REGARDING
DEFENDANT’S THIRD-PARTY
SUBPOENAS AND PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENAS TO
THIRD-PARTIES AND MOTION FOR
PROTECTIVE ORDER

27
28
1
PROPOSED ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION– CASE NO. 2:13-CV-01397-JAM-KJN

1
2
3

After consideration of the Parties’ Stipulation Regarding Defendant’s Third-Party
Subpoenas and Plaintiff’s Motion to Quash Subpoenas to Third-Parties and Motion for Protective
Order (ECF No. 67), it is hereby ORDERED as follows:

4
5
6

The hearing scheduled for August 20, 2015 on Plaintiff’s Motion to Quash Defendants
Subpoenas to Third Parties and Motion for Protective Order (ECF No. 64) is vacated without
prejudice to rescheduling, if necessary, upon Plaintiff’s request;1 and

7
8
9
10

Defendant shall not attempt to enforce the non-party subpoenas to JPMorgan Chase &
Co., “JPMorgan Mortgage Acceptance Corporation” and JPMorgan Securities, LLC or address
the objections to those subpoenas until after a ruling is entered on Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to
Amend the Complaint (ECF No. 56).

11

IT IS SO ORDERED.

12
13

Dated: July 30, 2015

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

1

If plaintiff no longer seeks to pursue its pending discovery motion after
its pending motion for leave to amend its complaint has been resolved, it
shall make a filing expressing its intent to withdraw the motion. If
plaintiff intends to continue with this motion after resolution of the motion
to amend, then it shall contact the undersigned’s courtroom deputy to schedule
either a hearing date or an informal telephonic discovery conference before
the undersigned.

2