JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. v. Sierra Pacific Mortgage Company, Inc.

Filing 99

ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO FILE UNDER SEAL signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 01/08/16 ORDERING that Exhibit A-15 of 94 Chases Appendix of Evidence related to its Motion to Compel is SEALED. Clerk shall remove Exhibit A-15 from the publically available Court Docket. (Benson, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 PHILIP A. MCLEOD, CASB 101101 NATHAN JASKOWIAK, CASB 248007 KEESAL, YOUNG & LOGAN 450 Pacific Avenue San Francisco, California 94133 Telephone: (415)398-6000 Facsimile: (415)981-0136 -andGREGORY M. SUDBURY Admitted Pro Hac KODIE P. BENNION Admitted Pro Hac QUILLING, SELANDER, LOWNDS, WINSLETT & MOSER, P.C. 2001 Bryan Street, Suite 1800 Dallas, Texas 75201 Telephone: (214) 880-1878 Facsimile: (214) 871-2111 ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. 11 12 13 14 15 16 JONATHAN M. JENKINS, CASB 193011 LARA T. KAYAYAN, CASB 239384 JENKINS KAYAYAN LLP 444 S. Flower Street, Suite 1530 Los Angeles, CA 90071 Telephone: (310) 984-6800 Facsimile: (310-984-6840 ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT SIERRA PACIFIC MORTGAGE COMPANY, INC. 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 18 19 20 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., Plaintiff, 21 22 23 24 No. 2:13-CV-01397-JAM-KJN The Hon. Kendall J. Newman Robert T. Matsui Courthouse v. SIERRA PACIFIC MORTGAGE COMPANY, INC., PROPOSED ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO FILE UNDER SEAL Defendant. 25 26 27 28 After consideration of the Plaintiff JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.’s Request to File Under Seal, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1 PROPOSED ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION– CASE NO. 2:13-CV-01397-JAM-KJN 1 2 3 4 5 Exhibit “A-15” of Chase’s Appendix of Evidence related to its Motion to Compel (ECF No. 94-1 at 200-29) is hereby sealed. The Clerk of Court shall remove Exhibit “A-15” from the publically available Court Docket. IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 7 Dated: January 8, 2016 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?