JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. v. Sierra Pacific Mortgage Company, Inc.
Filing
99
ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO FILE UNDER SEAL signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 01/08/16 ORDERING that Exhibit A-15 of 94 Chases Appendix of Evidence related to its Motion to Compel is SEALED. Clerk shall remove Exhibit A-15 from the publically available Court Docket. (Benson, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
PHILIP A. MCLEOD, CASB 101101
NATHAN JASKOWIAK, CASB 248007
KEESAL, YOUNG & LOGAN
450 Pacific Avenue
San Francisco, California 94133
Telephone: (415)398-6000
Facsimile: (415)981-0136
-andGREGORY M. SUDBURY
Admitted Pro Hac
KODIE P. BENNION
Admitted Pro Hac
QUILLING, SELANDER, LOWNDS,
WINSLETT & MOSER, P.C.
2001 Bryan Street, Suite 1800
Dallas, Texas 75201
Telephone: (214) 880-1878
Facsimile: (214) 871-2111
ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
11
12
13
14
15
16
JONATHAN M. JENKINS, CASB 193011
LARA T. KAYAYAN, CASB 239384
JENKINS KAYAYAN LLP
444 S. Flower Street, Suite 1530
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Telephone: (310) 984-6800
Facsimile: (310-984-6840
ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT
SIERRA PACIFIC MORTGAGE COMPANY, INC.
17
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
18
19
20
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.,
Plaintiff,
21
22
23
24
No. 2:13-CV-01397-JAM-KJN
The Hon. Kendall J. Newman
Robert T. Matsui Courthouse
v.
SIERRA PACIFIC MORTGAGE
COMPANY, INC.,
PROPOSED ORDER GRANTING
REQUEST TO FILE UNDER SEAL
Defendant.
25
26
27
28
After consideration of the Plaintiff JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.’s Request to File Under
Seal, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
1
PROPOSED ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION– CASE NO. 2:13-CV-01397-JAM-KJN
1
2
3
4
5
Exhibit “A-15” of Chase’s Appendix of Evidence related to its Motion to Compel (ECF
No. 94-1 at 200-29) is hereby sealed.
The Clerk of Court shall remove Exhibit “A-15” from the publically available Court
Docket.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
7
Dated: January 8, 2016
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?