Howard v. City of Vallejo et al

Filing 30

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 7/23/2014 ORDERING that the court DISAPPROVES the 29 proposed stipulated protective order, but without prejudice to the parties submitting a revised proposed stipulated protective order that complies with and references the Local Rules of this district, including, but not limited to, Local Rules 140 (privacy concerns and redaction); 141 (sealing of documents); and 141.1 (orders protecting confidential information). (Zignago, K.)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

MONTAE HOWARD,

12
13
14
15

No. 2:13-cv-1439-LKK-KJN

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER

ROBERT GREENBERG, et al.,
Defendants.

16
17

The parties have submitted a proposed stipulated protective order for the court’s review

18

and approval. (ECF No. 29.) The proposed stipulated protective order makes reference to

19

various Civil Local Rules that are not the Local Rules of this court. Accordingly, the court

20

disapproves the proposed stipulated protective order, but without prejudice to the parties

21

submitting a revised proposed stipulated protective order that complies with and references the

22

Local Rules of this district, including, but not limited to, Local Rules 140 (privacy concerns and

23

redaction); 141 (sealing of documents); and 141.1 (orders protecting confidential information).

24
25

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: July 23, 2014

26
27
28
1