Springfield v. Singh et al

Filing 51

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 06/14/17 ordering that within fourteen days from the date of this order, defendants shall respond to plaintiffs requests 49 , 50 and inform the court of the status of the payment of the settlement proceeds.(Plummer, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

CIRON B. SPRINGFIELD,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

v.

No. 2:13-cv-1442 KJN P

ORDER

L. BENDER, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
17

Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se. Plaintiff has filed two requests concerning

18

the enforcement of his settlement agreement. The record reflects that on October 22, 2015,

19

another magistrate judge settled this action. On January 11, 2016, both sides signed a stipulation

20

for voluntary dismissal of this action, and this case was dismissed with prejudice on January 28,

21

2016. (ECF Nos. 47, 48.) Plaintiff now claims that he has not received the settlement proceeds.

22

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within fourteen days from the date of this

23

order, defendants shall respond to plaintiff’s requests (ECF Nos. 49, 50) and inform the court of

24

the status of the payment of the settlement proceeds.

25

Dated: June 14, 2017

26
27
28

/spri1442.set.fb

1