Youngblood v. Superior Court of Butte Co. et al
Filing
9
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 09/11/13 granting 7 Motion to Proceed IFP. This action is dismissed without prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Plummer, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JESSE L. YOUNGBLOOD,
12
Petitioner,
13
14
15
16
v.
No. 2:13-cv-1490 GGH P
ORDER
SUPERIOR COURT OF BUTTE CO., et
al.,
Respondents.
17
18
Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas
19
corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 together with a request to proceed in forma pauperis
20
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915.
21
Examination of the in forma pauperis affidavit reveals that petitioner is unable to afford
22
the costs of suit. Accordingly, the request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. See
23
28 U.S.C. § 1915(a).
24
The court’s records reveal that petitioner has previously filed an application for a writ of
25
habeas corpus attacking the conviction and sentence challenged in this case. The previous
26
application was filed on May 2, 2011, and was denied on the merits on September 20, 2012. See
27
Youngblood v. Donovan, 2:11-cv-1223 DAD. Before petitioner can proceed with the instant
28
application, he must move in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for an order
1
1
authorizing the district court to consider the application. 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3). Therefore,
2
petitioner’s application must be dismissed without prejudice to its refiling upon obtaining
3
authorization from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
4
In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
5
1. Petitioner’s application to proceed in forma pauperis is granted; and
6
2. This action is dismissed without prejudice.
7
Dated: September 11, 2013
8
/s/ Gregory G. Hollows
9
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
10
GGH:076/Youn1490.success
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?