Jenderjack v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLC

Filing 10

ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 10/15/13 GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION TO STAY LITIGATION. Litigation in this case shall be STAYED until 11/29/2013, so that the Parties can attempt to resolve this case informally. If by 11/29/13, the Parties hav e not reached an agreement that will lead to resolution of this case, and are not close enough to such resolution that a further stay of the case would be productive, Nationstar will file a response to the complaint no later than 12/13/2013.(Mena-Sanchez, L)

1 MARY KATE SULLIVAN (State Bar No. 180203)
LASZLO LADI (State Bar No. 265564)
2 [e-mail]
SEVERSON & WERSON
3 A Professional Corporation
One Embarcadero Center, Suite 2600
4 San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: [phone]
5 Facsimile: [phone]
6 Attorneys for Defendant
NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC
7
8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA — SACRAMENTO DIVISION

11
12 JANET RUTH JENDERJACK,

Case No. 2:13-CV-01508-JAM-CKD

13

ORDER GRANTING JOINT
STIPULATION TO STAY LITIGATION

14

Plaintiff,
vs.

Action Filed:

May 16, 2013

15 NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC; and
DOES 1-20, inclusive,
16
Defendants.
17
18
19

The Court, having duly considered the Joint Stipulation and Request to Stay Litigation of

20 defendant Nationstar Mortgage, LLC (“Nationstar”) and plaintiff Janet Ruth Jenderjack
21 (“Plaintiff”) (collectively referred to as the “Parties”), and good cause appearing, hereby orders as
22 follows:
23
24
25
26
27
28

1. Litigation in this case shall be stayed until November 29, 2013, so that the Parties can
attempt to resolve this case informally;
2. If by November 29, 2013, the Parties are close to reaching a resolution of this matter,
they will attempt to agree to further stay this case;
3. If by November 29, 2013, the Parties have not reached an agreement that will lead to
resolution of this case, and are not close enough to such resolution that a further stay of
11951.0207/2879292.1

1
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION TO STAY LITIGATION

1

the case would be productive, Nationstar will file a response to the complaint no later

2

than December 13, 2013.

3

4. Any of the Parties may request a termination of the stay upon written notice of such

4

termination if the loan modification review is no longer productive. Specifically, a

5

termination may be requested if Plaintiff has been denied for a loan modification and

6

has exhausted all appeal rights or if Plaintiff has not submitted a complete loan

7

modification application within the reasonable timeframes specified by Nationstar.

8

Nationstar will file a response to the complaint no later than fourteen-days following

9

their receipt of such written notification.

10

5. Nationstar will not cause to be recorded a Notice of Trustee’s Sale if Plaintiff has

11

submitted a complete loan modification application, or, if Plaintiff has submitted a

12

complete loan modification application and Nationstar has denied said application and

13

has given Plaintiff an explanation in writing with specificity as to why said loan

14

modification was denied and Plaintiff has exhausted or waived all appeal rights as is

15

specified in the California Civil Code.

16 IT IS SO ORDERED.
17 DATED: 10/15/2013
18

/s/ John A. Mendez_________

___________

19

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
11951.0207/2879292.1

2
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION TO STAY LITIGATION