Harrison v. Linde, et. al.

Filing 46

ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 7/25/13 ORDERING that the findings and recommendations filed February 25, 2013 30 and the findings and recommendations filed March 1, 2013 36 are adopted in full, except as ordered below; Plaintiff s motion for law library access 29 is DENIED; Defendants motion to sever 22 is GRANTED; The claims in 12-cv-02000 shall be severed into two separate actions. The current case number shall remain assigned to the claims against defendants DeBo ard and Lopez. The Clerk of Court is directed to assign a new case number for the claims against defendants Simpson and Linde, and assign the same district judge and magistrate judge as in this action. The filings from 12-cv-02000 shall be included on the dockets of each case; and the Clerk of the Court shall make an adjustment in the assignment of civil cases to compensate for the new cases filed as ordered above.(Dillon, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CARL F. HARRISON, 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 14 15 16 No. 2:12-cv-2000 KJM CKD P vs. SERGEANT LINDE, et al., Defendants. ORDER / Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action 17 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 18 Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 19 On February 15, 2013, plaintiff filed a motion requesting a court order for access 20 to the law library. On February 25, 2013, the magistrate judge filed findings and 21 recommendations, which were served on both parties and which contained notice to both parties 22 that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. 23 Neither party has filed objections to these findings and recommendations. 24 On January 3, 2013, defendants Linde and Simpson filed a motion to sever 25 claims. On March 1, 2013, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were 26 served on both parties and which contained notice to both parties that any objections to the 1 1 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed 2 objections to these findings and recommendations. 3 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 4 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the file, 5 the court finds the findings and recommendations generally to be supported by the record and by 6 the proper analysis. However, dismissal of plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claims is not required 7 as unrelated claims may be severed into separate lawsuits. Coughlin v. Rogers, 130 F.3d 1348, 8 1350 (9th Cir. 1997). See, e.g., Hernandez v. United States, 802 F. Supp. 2d 834, 847 (W.D. 9 Tex. 2011) (severing unrelated claims into separate suits); Baughman v. Lee County, MS, 554 F. 10 Supp. 2d 652, 655 (N.D. Miss. 2008) (same). The court finds such a severance will achieve 11 judicial efficiency and serve the interests of justice. 12 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 13 1. The findings and recommendations filed February 25, 2013 (Dkt. No. 30) and 14 the findings and recommendations filed March 1, 2013 (Dkt. No. 36) are adopted in full, except 15 as ordered below; 16 2. Plaintiff’s motion for law library access (Dkt. No. 29) is DENIED; 17 3. Defendant’s motion to sever (Dkt. No. 22) is GRANTED; 18 4. The claims in 12-cv-02000 shall be severed into two separate actions. The 19 current case number shall remain assigned to the claims against defendants DeBoard and Lopez. 20 The Clerk of Court is directed to assign a new case number for the claims against defendants 21 Simpson and Linde, and assign the same district judge and magistrate judge as in this action. 22 The filings from 12-cv-02000 shall be included on the dockets of each case; and 23 5. The Clerk of the Court shall make an adjustment in the assignment of civil 24 cases to compensate for the new cases filed as ordered above. 25 DATED: July 25, 2013. 26 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?