Walker v. Solano County Jail, et al.,

Filing 10

FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/2/2013 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller; Objections due within 14 days. (Yin, K)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

JOHNATHAN WALKER,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14
15

v.

No. 2:13-cv-1515 KJM KJN P

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

SOLANO COUNTY JAIL, et al.,
Defendants.

16
17

By an order filed August 2, 2013, plaintiff was ordered to file an in forma pauperis

18

affidavit or pay the appropriate filing fee within thirty days and was cautioned that failure to do so

19

would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The thirty day period has now

20

expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order and has not filed an in forma pauperis

21

affidavit or paid the appropriate filing fee. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that

22

this action be dismissed without prejudice.

23

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

24

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days

25

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

26

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned

27

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the

28

objections shall be filed and served within fourteen days after service of the objections. The
1

1

parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to

2

appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

3

Dated: October 2, 2013

4
5
6

walk1515.fifp

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2