Wilkerson v. Beard et al
Filing
35
ORDER for INTRADISTRICT TRANSFER from Sacramento (2:13-cv-1518) to Fresno (1:14-cv-1417) signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 09/11/14. Plaintiff's motion 32 is denied without prejudice. The clerk of the court is directed to list J. Suiton, K. Carpentor and F. Feliciano as defendants herein and terminate the individuals previously named as defendants. (Plummer, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ROGER WILKERSON,
12
No. 2:13-cv-1518 TLN KJN P
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
J. SUITON, et al.,
15
ORDER
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff is a state prisoner presently housed at the Los Angeles County Jail. Plaintiff is
18
proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis. By order filed August 27, 2014, this action was
19
reopened, and remanded for screening of plaintiff’s amended complaint. (ECF No. 33.)
20
First, the court notes that plaintiff filed a motion for “appropriate settlement” on August
21
21, 2014. (ECF No. 32.) Plaintiff’s motion is premature. Defendants have not yet been served.
22
Thus, plaintiff’s motion is denied without prejudice.
23
Second, plaintiff’s amended complaint names as defendants the following individuals: J.
24
Suiton, K. Carpentor, and F. Feliciano, all employees at Wasco State Prison in Wasco, California,
25
and contends that these defendants failed to transfer plaintiff away from Wasco where plaintiff
26
was at risk of contracting Valley Fever because plaintiff suffers from a medical condition that
27
suppresses his immunity. In light of this amendment, the Clerk of the Court is directed to list
28
J. Suiton, K. Carpentor, and F. Feliciano as defendants herein, and to terminate the individuals
1
1
previously named as defendants.
2
Third, plaintiff alleges violations of his civil rights by the defendants employed at Wasco
3
State Prison. The alleged violations took place in Kern County, which is part of the Fresno
4
Division of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. See Local Rule
5
120(d).
6
Pursuant to Local Rule 120(f), a civil action which has not been commenced in the proper
7
division of a court may, on the court’s own motion, be transferred to the proper division of the
8
court. Therefore, this action will be transferred to the Fresno Division of the court
9
Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
10
1. Plaintiff’s motion (ECF No. 32) is denied without prejudice;
11
2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to list J. Suiton, K. Carpentor, and F. Feliciano as
12
13
14
15
16
defendants herein, and terminate the individuals previously named as defendants;
3. This action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
California sitting in Fresno; and
4. All future filings shall reference the new Fresno case number assigned and shall be
filed at:
United States District Court
Eastern District of California
2500 Tulare Street
Fresno, CA 93721
17
18
19
Dated: September 11, 2014
20
21
/wilk1518.22
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?