Hopson v. Kapiniaris, et al

Filing 13

ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 2/24/14 ORDERING that defendant Frank Kapiniaris is DISMISSED from the action for plaintiff's failure to timely effect service. Plaintiff is directed to seek entry of default and move for default judgment against defendant Luis Angel Ramirez Gomez within 30 days of the date of this order. Failure to do so will result in dismissal of the action. (Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 WILLIAM HOPSON, No. 2:13-cv-01561-KJM-DAD 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 16 v. ORDER LUIS ANGEL RAMIREZ GOMEZ, et al., Defendants. 17 18 The court has previously issued plaintiff two orders to show cause. ECF Nos. 8, 19 10. In the first, erroneously stating that defendants had been served on July 31, 2013, the court 20 ordered plaintiff to explain why the matter should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. 21 ECF No. 8. Responding, plaintiff filed a declaration attesting that as of January 29, 2014, 22 “plaintiff’s process server was still attempting to perfect service.” Malakauskas Decl. ¶ 2, ECF 23 No. 9. Accordingly, the court discharged the order. ECF No. 10. 24 In discharging the first order, however, the court simultaneously issued a 25 second, ordering plaintiff to now explain why he had failed to timely effect service as required 26 under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). Id. In response, plaintiff filed only a proof of 27 service showing that one of the two named defendants, Luis Angel Ramirez Gomez, had been 28 served on August 2, 2013. ECF No. 11. 1 1 Accordingly, defendant Frank Kapiniaris is dismissed from the action for 2 plaintiff’s failure to timely effect service. Plaintiff is directed to seek entry of default and move 3 for default judgment against defendant Luis Angel Ramirez Gomez within thirty days of the 4 date of this order. Failure to do so will result in dismissal of the action. 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 24, 2014. 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?