Jacobs v. Sacramento Swap Meet, Inc.

Filing 7

ORDER granting 5 Motion for TRO signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 8/2/13: This Temporary Restraining Order ("TRO") shall remain in effect until August 5, 2013, upon which date this Order shall automatically expire, rendering this Order ineffective and inconsequential. (Kaminski, H)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 United States District Court 9 Eastern District of California 10 11 12 Christian Jacobs, Plaintiff, 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 v. Sacramento Swap Meet, Inc. dba Sacramento Classic Car & Parts Swap Meet, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2:13-cv-01575-TLN-KJN Order Granting Joint Stipulation to Motion for Temporary Restraining Order Hon. Troy L. Nunley 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Jacobs v. Sacramento Swap Meet, Inc. Case No. 2:13-cv-01575-TLN-KJN Order Granting Joint Stipulation to Motion for Temporary Restraining Order 1 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 SSM shall be enjoined from detaining, removing, or prohibiting 3 Jacobs from SSM’s public accommodation, the parking lot of the Sleep 4 Train Arena, at 1 Sports Parkway in Sacramento, CA, (“Venue”) on August 5 4, 2013, so long as SSM’s basis for Jacobs’ detention, removal, or 6 prohibition is that Jacobs utilizes a power-driven mobility device. This 7 Order shall not excuse Jacobs from adhering to SSM's and Venue's rules 8 applicable to all ticketed attendees, which may include the prohibited 9 solicitation of products, merchandise and/or services. This Temporary 10 Restraining Order (“TRO”) shall remain in effect until August 5, 2013, 11 upon which date this Order shall automatically expire, rendering this Order 12 ineffective and inconsequential. 13 14 IT IS SO ORDERED: 15 16 Date: August 2, 2013 17 18 19 20 21 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Jacobs v. Sacramento Swap Meet, Inc. Case No. 2:13-cv-01575-TLN-KJN Order Granting Joint Stipulation to Motion for Temporary Restraining Order 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?