Jacobs v. Sacramento Swap Meet, Inc.
Filing
7
ORDER granting 5 Motion for TRO signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 8/2/13: This Temporary Restraining Order ("TRO") shall remain in effect until August 5, 2013, upon which date this Order shall automatically expire, rendering this Order ineffective and inconsequential. (Kaminski, H)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
United States District Court
9
Eastern District of California
10
11
12
Christian Jacobs,
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
v.
Sacramento Swap Meet, Inc. dba
Sacramento Classic Car & Parts
Swap Meet,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 2:13-cv-01575-TLN-KJN
Order Granting Joint Stipulation
to Motion for Temporary
Restraining Order
Hon. Troy L. Nunley
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Jacobs v. Sacramento Swap Meet, Inc.
Case No. 2:13-cv-01575-TLN-KJN
Order Granting Joint Stipulation to Motion for Temporary Restraining Order
1
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
SSM shall be enjoined from detaining, removing, or prohibiting
3
Jacobs from SSM’s public accommodation, the parking lot of the Sleep
4
Train Arena, at 1 Sports Parkway in Sacramento, CA, (“Venue”) on August
5
4, 2013, so long as SSM’s basis for Jacobs’ detention, removal, or
6
prohibition is that Jacobs utilizes a power-driven mobility device. This
7
Order shall not excuse Jacobs from adhering to SSM's and Venue's rules
8
applicable to all ticketed attendees, which may include the prohibited
9
solicitation of products, merchandise and/or services. This Temporary
10
Restraining Order (“TRO”) shall remain in effect until August 5, 2013,
11
upon which date this Order shall automatically expire, rendering this Order
12
ineffective and inconsequential.
13
14
IT IS SO ORDERED:
15
16
Date: August 2, 2013
17
18
19
20
21
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Jacobs v. Sacramento Swap Meet, Inc.
Case No. 2:13-cv-01575-TLN-KJN
Order Granting Joint Stipulation to Motion for Temporary Restraining Order
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?